Page 23 - ดุลพาห เล่ม3.indd
P. 23

ดุลพาห




            persons, leaving the courts of each member state to apply national law to determine
            the domicile of a natural person defendant . On the other hand, the definition of
                                                      36
            domicile for a legal person is laid down in Article 63. It provides that a company or
            other legal person or association of natural or legal persons is domiciled at the place

            where it has its statutory seat, central administration, or principal place of business.


            3. Special Jurisdiction


                     The rules of special jurisdiction broaden general jurisdiction by providing
            an extra option for the plaintiff to sue the defendant in a court other than that of the

            defendant’s domicile. In general, special jurisdiction requires a substantial link
            between the dispute and the forum.

                     (1) Jurisdiction relating to contracts

                     (a) The current state of Thai law

                     The CPC does not contain detailed jurisdictional rules for a claim relating
            to a contract. Section 4 (1) of the CPC simply states that “the complaint shall be

            submitted to … the court in which the cause of action occurs within its territorial
            jurisdiction, whether or not the defendant would have a domicile in Thailand.” This

            provision has been interpreted as a general principle for jurisdiction in contractual
            and tortious matters, which confers special jurisdiction to the Thai court in which the

            cause of action arises. This rule is intended to ensure that jurisdiction over a party
            may be exercised only when there is a strong connection between the forum

            and the dispute by using a “cause of action” as a point of contact. In addition,
            Section 3 (1) exceptionally confers special jurisdiction on the Civil Court located




            36. Article 62 of the Brussels I (recast):
                    “(1) In order to determine whether a party is domiciled in the Member State whose courts are
              seised of a matter, the court shall apply its internal law
                    (2) If a party is not domiciled in the Member State whose courts are seised of the matter, then,
              in order to determine whether the party is domiciled in another Member State, the court shall apply
              the law of that Member State.”



            12                                                               เล่มที่ ๓ ปีที่ ๖๕
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28