Page 10 - EW February 2023
P. 10

Editorial



         BASIC STRUCTURE MUST REMAIN INVIOLATE                             on the right to free speech and prop-
                                                                           erty ownership, in the Kesavananda
                                                                           Bharati Case (1973), the apex court
              he clarion call of vice Presi-  Constitution of India.       ruled that legislation enacted by Par-
              dent Jagdeep Dhankar and Lok   The first point to bear in mind is   liament which violates the basic struc-
         TSabha  Speaker  Om  Birla,  for   that unlike the UK, which doesn’t have   ture of the Constitution — designed to
         review of the Supreme Court’s judge-  a written constitution, the Constitu-  safeguard the fundamental rights of
         ment in the landmark Kesavananda   tion of India is a written document   minority citizens — is invalid even if
         Bharati Case (1973) in which (accept-  whose every provision was extensively   passed unanimously.
         ing  the  argument  of  eminent  jurist   debated by a distinguished Constitu-  In light of this history and evolu-
         Nani  Palkhivala  (1920-2002)),  the   ent Assembly for almost four years. As   tion of checks and balances and sepa-
         Supreme Court held that legislation   such, it’s binding upon all estates of   ration  of  powers,  it’s  plain  that  the
         enacted by Parliament which violates   the realm — parliament, executive, the   Dhankar-Birla proposal which posits
         the “basic structure” of the Constitu-  judiciary, media and citizenry.   that Parliament has the final word in
         tion is invalid, is fraught with danger.   However  as  it  became  manifest   national governance, is misconceived.
         It  should  be  opposed  by  all  right-  later,  the  Constitution  contained   Rather than Parliament/executive, it’s
         thinking members of society.     some anomalies, if not contradictions.   the Constitution as interpreted by the
           The argument of proponents of ju-  Therefore in 1967 in Golak Nath’s Case,   judiciary, that’s supreme.
         dicial review of this historic judgement   the apex court ruled that Article 368   If absolute authority to amend the
         is  driven  by  belief  that  Article  368,   notwithstanding, Parliament does not   Constitution is conceded to a transient
         which permits a two-thirds majority   have power to alter or abridge citizens’   Parliament with a five-year term, the
         of Parliament to alter and amend any   fundamental rights enshrined in Part   BJP government with its two-thirds
         provision of the Constitution, ipso fac-  III of the Constitution, and the seven   majority  could  enact  legislation  de-
         to acknowledges the supremacy of a   freedoms contained in Article 19. The   claring India a Hindu state, an initia-
         duly elected Parliament in the nation-  court ruled that Parliament/govern-  tive that would be totally contrary to
         al governance schema. To grasp the   ment may impose reasonable restric-  the intent of the founding fathers of
         fallacy of this argument based on the   tions on fundamental rights subject to   the Constitution. Therefore, the pro-
         example of unlimited power exercised   endorsement by the Supreme Court.   posal to reconsider the verdict of the
         by the British parliament (“the mother   But with Parliament dominated by the   apex court in the Kesavananda Case
         of all parliaments”), it’s important to   socialist Congress party continuing to   should be firmly rejected by all right-
         recall the evolutionary history of the   enact legislation imposing restrictions   thinking members of society.

         IMPORTANT LESSON OF PANDEMIC LOCKDOWN                             new digital learning technologies.
                                                                             Demonstrated capability of school
                                                                           children countrywide to continue to
              ontrary to alarmist headlines in   lockdown was lifted in late 2021, the   learn  despite  schools  being  under
              mainstream media proclaiming   percentage of class V children who can   tight lockdown, is a clear signal that
         Csteep learning loss experienced   read and understand class II texts is   traditional classroom pedagogies need
         by  children  in  elementary  (class  I-  42.8 percent, indicating slippage but   to change. Clearly in-school children
         VIII) education in rural India, care-  not disaster. Likewise, the percentage   must be given greater opportunity to
         ful  reading  of  the  Annual Status of   of class III children who can manage   self-learn  through  exploration,  dis-
         Education Report (ASER) 2022 sug-  two-digit subtraction sums fell from   covery and experience with teachers
         gests the opposite. Although because   28.2 percent in 2018 to 25.9 in 2022,   transforming  from  sage-on-stage  to
         schools  in  India  were  ill-advisedly   and who could manage three-digit di-  guides-by-the-side of children. In the
         shuttered for 82 weeks to check the   vision sums from 27.9 percent to 25.6,   early  years  of  the  new  millennium,
         spread of the Covid-19 pandemic —   from bad to worse, but not by much.    Prof.  Sugata  Mitra’s  computer-in-
         the longest education lockdown of any   A clear lesson of the over-long pan-  the-wall  experiment  demonstrated
         major country worldwide — children   demic lockdown is the resilience and   that given access to new digital tech-
         did experience some learning loss, the   enthusiasm for learning that India’s   nologies, even poorest children learn
         damage they have suffered is not as   school children have demonstrated. By   quickly through experimentation and
         severe as forecast.              utilising household smart phones and   experience. Minimal damage suffered
           According to ASER 2022, in 2018   television  —  93.3  percent  of  house-  by way of learning loss despite the ex-
         prior to the outbreak of the pandemic,   holds nationwide own a smart phone,   tended pandemic-induced lockdown
         50.5 percent of class V children across   and 67.8 percent own a television set   of schools as testified by ASER 2022,
         government and private rural prima-  — enlisting the help of family elders   is  further  proof  that  children  must
         ries  were  able  to  successfully  read   and through peer learning, relatively   be  given  opportunities  to  learn  dif-
         and comprehend  class II textbooks   underprivileged  rural  children  have   ferently, viz, through challenge-and-
         —  a pathetic indictment of the qual-  averted disastrous learning loss. Rela-  response,  peer-to-peer  and  digital
         ity  of  education  being  dispensed  in   tively  privileged  urban  children  are   pedagogies.
         the country’s  elementary education   likely to have suffered even less learn-  This important lesson derived from
         system, but that’s another story. Sub-  ing  decline.  Moreover,  all  children   the longest lockdown of education in-
         sequent to schools reopening after the   have become better acquainted with   stitutions worldwide, must not be lost.

         10    EDUCATIONWORLD   FEBRUARY 2023
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15