Page 87 - EW February 2026
P. 87

Vision Mumbai Plan       dependence on exclusive   term spatial planning with   ing in Mumbai’ — which is
         (2003); Citizens Action   spatial planning tools like   medium-term investment   both insightful and a de-
         Group (CAG); Bombay Ur-  land use, FSI, and zoning   strategies and rationalized   light to read. It advocates
         ban Development Project   to manage population   FSI. Integrated sectoral   for the much-neglected
         (BUDP, 1985-1994), which   growth has persisted.  plans, Phatak argues,   pedestrian. Four out of ten
         turned a swamp into the    Phatak comments       could open up areas along   Mumbaikars walk to work;
         Bandra-Kurla Complex;    insightfully and gently   transit routes and ease   the rest must walk to the
         Mumbai Metro Rail Cor-   points to the persistence of   pressure on the urban   bus stop or train station.
         poration Ltd (MMRCL);    conservative attitudes in   mainland.              A word about CEPT
         Maharashtra Railway Vi-  planning. In the post-in-  A word of caution:    University Press — it
         kas Corporation (MRVC);   dependence decades, me-  these essays are not for   has done sterling work
         Special Planning Author-  tropolises were denounced   the uninitiated. They   in publishing thoughtful
         ity for the New Airport   as parasitic creatures of   contain dense, technical   books and monographs on
         Influence Notified Area   imperialism. The concen-  discussion from the field   architecture and planning.
         (NAINA); Maharashtra     tration of wealth in cities   of urban planning. It took   Phatak’s book would have
         Industrial Development   was seen as depriving less-  the reviewer time to wrap   benefited from proper co-
         Corporation (MIDC); and   privileged regions — when,   his head around terms   pyediting. There is no glos-
         Greater Mumbai Develop-  in fact, concentrated eco-  like Land Capture Value   sary to explain the many
         ment Plan (MCGM, 2015).   nomic urban activity often   (LCF) and Value Capture   acronyms that dominate
         Whew!                    created opportunities in   Financing (VCF), which   planning discourse. And
           Phatak observes that   distant places.         stem from 19th-century   in a book of this scope,
         there has been little hori-  Long-term plans have   utilitarian ideas of taxing   the absence of an index is
         zontal dialogue between   largely failed; they did   ‘rent’ and debates on the   inexcusable. In today’s age,
         agencies. There was much   not anticipate trends like   confiscatory nature of   generating a proper index
         talk about ‘integration’,   Mumbai’s increasing con-  state taxation. For the   is just a click away.
         few admitted that it was   gestion. What was needed   layperson, there is just one   PARTHO DATTA (The
         not working. An over-    was a combination of long-  accessible essay — ‘Walk-      Book Review)











































                                                                         FEBRUARY 2026    EDUCATIONWORLD   87
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92