Page 37 - Gi flipbook_May 2019
P. 37

igem news – yppc



                 FIGURE 3 MAP OF GAS NETWORK SUPPLYING BEAL INDICATING HOLYGARTH LANE  FIGURE 4 MAP OF GAS NETWORK WITH FLOOD MAPPING AND LOW POINTS (ELEVATION)















                 Remotely monitored syphon        TABLE 1 WET GAS AND DRY GAS   FIGURE 6 PE SYPHON ASSEMBLY WITH COMPONENT PARTS
                 IGEM/TD/3 states that syphons should   THRESHOLDS FOR DEW POINT
                 be installed at low points on the   MEASUREMENTS
                 network to collect condensate, and
                 metallic condensate receiver designs   dry gas  wet gas
                 are specified in the now withdrawn   dew point Oc dew point Oc dew point Oc
                 BS 785 and BS 47726. The aim of the
                 project was to develop a remotely   -50  -24    2
                 monitored PE syphon by completing the   -48  -22  4
                 following tasks:
                    Remote monitoring technology    -46   -20    5
                  feasibility study                 -44    -18   6
                    Remote monitoring PE syphon design  -42  -16  7    FIGURE 7 SYPHON IMPACT ON EXCAVATION DIMENSIONS
                    Testing and qualification       -40    -14   8
                    G/23 field trial                -38    -12   9
                                                    -36    -10   10
                 Feasibility study
                 A technology ranking matrix was    -34    -8    11
                 used to determine the most suitable   -32  -6   12
                 technology for use on the remotely   -30  -4    13
                 monitored syphon based on the      -28    -2    14
                 assessment criteria shown in Table 2:  -26  0   15

                 Remote monitoring syphon design
                 The remotely monitored syphon    TABLE 2 WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY RANKING SUMMARY
                 contains two main sub-assemblies:
                    PE syphon tank (containing dip-pipe)  water   water   compatability  cost of remote  maintenance/  compatability   total score   ranking
                                                                   with remote
                                                            fill level
                    Remote monitoring instrumentation   measurement   measurement   transmitting   monitoring   maintainability  with pe syphon
                                                   technology/
                                                                                            tank
                                                                            system

                  (housed in a test post)          technique  capability  data logger

                 PE syphon                         hydrostatic   1    5      3       3       3       15      8
                 A PE syphon using only GIS/PL27   pressure
                 approved fittings was designed. An   differential   4   5   3       4       4       20      1
                 illustration of an assembled PE syphon   pressure
                 is shown in Figure 6.             displacer   4      4      3       3       2       16      7
                   The PE syphon has been designed to   level sensors
                 minimise the excavation footprint whilst   ultrasonic   4   5   2   4       3       17      3=
                                                   measurement
                 enabling the maximum water removal
                 from the gas network. The syphon is 1.2m   conductive   4   4   3   3       3       17      3=
                                                   level switch
                 in length and is fitted with the base of the   laser level   1   4   2   4   3      14      9=
                 syphon tank at a depth of approximately   measurement
                 0.6m below the host main (see Figure 7).  buoyancy   4   4   4      2       32      17      3=
                                                   float
                                                   detection
                  FIGURE 5 HYGROMETER TEST LOCATIONS AND RESULTS  non-contact   1   4   2   3   3    13      11
                                                   radar
                                                   guided wave   4    4      2       2       2       14      9=
                                                   radar
                                                   float switch   4   4      3       4       2       17      3=
                                                   detection
                                                   capacitance   4    4      3       3       4       18      2
                                                   measurement

                                                      feasible (with few challenges   feasible (with several challenges   not feasible
                                                      to prototpe creatiion)  to prototpe creatiion)


                                                                                                                        37



        IGEMNews_YPPC.indd   2                                                                                    16/04/2019   19:01
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42