Page 174 - Parameter D_BPA AREA VI

Indicators, “Spacious”, “Quality of sound system”, “Quality if lighting” and
“Ventilation” all gained a description of “excellent” with a weighted mean of 4.80,
4.70, 4.70, and 4.80 respectively.

Table 12. Evaluation on Food

Food Weight Description
ed
Mean
Quality 4.80 Excellent
Quantity 4.90 Excellent
GRAND 4.85 Excellent
MEAN
Beneficiaries also evaluated the quality and quantity of the food being served
during the training. It can be seen in the Table that the food was “excellent” as this
wassupported with the grand mean of 4.85.
The food quality was excellent with a weighted mean of 4.80, the same with
the food quantity of 4.90.

Table 13. Level of Satisfaction on the Training

Level of satisfaction on the activity Mean Description
Over-all Satisfaction on the Program 4.85 Excellent

As seen on the table, beneficiaries rated their overall satisfaction on the
program with 4.85 with a description of “Excellent”

Prepared by:

JOAN TOMAS-RUIZ, DPA
Faculty Extensionist

6

INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND
GOVERNANCE