Page 85 - YORAM RUDY BOOK FINAL
P. 85

P. 85
        Role of Tissue Structure in Action Potential Propagation



                As stated earlier, cardiac conduction is the result of an interplay between membrane
        factors (source) and tissue structural factors (sink). The previous section focused on the
        membrane and its excitability properties. Here we examine the effects of tissue structural

        properties on conduction. In particular, we focus on reduced cell to cell coupling at gap junctions,
        and on structural inhomogeneities that alter source-sink relationships in a spatially dependent
        manner (e.g. tissue expansion or branching).



        Reduced Gap Junction Coupling


                The previous section characterized the properties of slow conduction due to reduced
        membrane excitability. Another mechanism of slow conduction is reduced intercellular coupling

        due to reduced gap junction conductance. Figure 3.8 shows conduction velocity (solid line) and
        SF (dashed line) as a function of gap junction conductance. The simulation was conducted in the
        1-dimensional fiber by reducing the conductance of all gap junctions uniformly over a range.
        Similar to reduced membrane excitability, progressive reduction of intercellular coupling slows

        conduction in a monotonic fashion. However, conduction attains a much slower velocity before
        failure occurs (0.26 cm/sec due to reduced coupling, compared to 17 cm/sec due to reduced
        membrane excitability). Relative to normal conduction, reduced coupling can decrease velocity by
        a factor of 200, while it is only a factor of 3 for reduced excitability. The extremely slow minimum

        velocity in Figure 3.8 corresponds closely to that measured experimentally in synthetic strands of
        decoupled rat myocytes.    178


                The explanation to this large difference between membrane supported and gap-junction

        supported slow conduction lies in the strikingly different behavior of SF (compare Figure 3.8 and
        Figure 3.5). In contrast to the monotonic decrease with decreasing excitability (Figure 3.5), SF in
        Figure 3.8 increases to a maximum as coupling is reduced. This maximum is reached at a highly
        reduced level of gap junction coupling of 0.023μS, about 100-fold smaller than normal coupling

        of 2.5 μS. The conduction velocity at maximum SF is very slow, about 1/15 of normal velocity.
        Hence, slow conduction due to reduced gap junction coupling is very robust, safer than
        normal conduction. This seemingly paradoxical property is a manifestation of the increased
        discontinuous nature of conduction when cells are partially decoupled. With reduced coupling,

        there is less electrotonic load and reduced axial current flow from a depolarizing cell to down-
        stream less depolarized cells. Consequently, there is greater confinement of depolarizing charge
        to the depolarizing cell, which depolarizes with a large margin of safety. However, because of the
        small axial current, there is a long delay to excitation of the downstream neighboring cell. Thus,

        propagation in the fiber proceeds with long conduction delays between cells that depolarize with
        high safety margin. This conduction is highly discontinuous, slow (due to the long intercellular
        delays), but very robust. Clearly, reduced membrane excitability and reduced cell-to-cell coupling
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90