Page 97 - YORAM RUDY BOOK FINAL
P. 97

P. 97
               It is clear from the above simulation that the spatial inhomogeneity (asymmetry of

        excitability) was introduced by a propagating action potential. It is not an intrinsic property of the
        tissue and the inhomogeneity is functional, rather than structural, in nature. Figure 3.17 depicts
        the distribution of excitability properties in the vicinity of the vulnerable window. Top panel shows
        the membrane potential along the fiber (V ). The second panel is the spatial distribution of
                                                       m
        sodium current conductance (channel availability, g ). The bottom two panels are the sodium
                                                                 Na
        current activation gate, m, and inactivation gate, h, computed at the time of peak g  (all these
                                                                                                    Na
        variables are plotted as solid lines in the figure).
        The asymmetry of excitability was quantified

        by the first spatial derivatives of these variables
        (curves plotted with square symbols in each
        panel of the figure). dV /dx is approximately
                                 m
        proportional to – dg    /dx  and – dh /dx in the
                              Na
        vicinity of the vulnerable window. Thus dV /dx
                                                      m
        provides a measure of the spatial heterogeneity
        of membrane excitability. This functional hetero-
        geneity results mostly from the heterogeneity in

        the state of sodium channel inactivation (h);
        recovery from inactivation is the major
        determinant of membrane refractoriness during
        action potential propagation. Unlike h, m is fully

        recovered in the vicinity of the window and does
        not display spatial heterogeneity (dm/dx = 0) in
        this region.



               The width of the vulnerable window has
        important implications to arrhythmogenesis; it
        provides a measure of the vulnerability to the
        development of unidirectional block and reentry.

        In the time domain, a wide TW implies that the
        probability of a premature stimulus hitting the
        window is high. In contrast, very precise timing is
        required to induce unidirectional block in a small

        TW. In normal cardiac tissue TW is very small              Figure 3.17.  Spatial distribution of mem-
        (<1ms), making the inducibility of unidirectional          brane excitability in the neighborhood of
        block and reentry negligible.   222,224  However, many     the vulnerable window during the refractory
                                                                   period. Solid curves represent parameters;
        pathological changes in electrophysiological
                                                                   squares represent first spatial derivatives.
        properties of the tissue (e.g. remodeling of ion           m and h are I  activation and inactivation
                                                                                 Na
        channels, reduced intercellular coupling) act to           gates, respectively. From Quan and Rudy
                                                                   [222], with permission from Wolters Kluwer
        widen the vulnerable window, rendering the
                                                                   Health, Inc.
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102