Page 452 - 24107
P. 452

Korach

                                                             ָ
                     beha’alOtcha ך ְתֹלֲע ַה ְּב                                                                   £All that God Does Is for the GoodAll that God Does Is for the GoodAll that God Does Is for the GoodAll that God Does Is for the GoodAll that God Does Is for the GoodAll that God Does Is for the Good
                                                                                                                    ££££



                                                                                                          Paradoxically, while the world is a reflection of the Torah, the Torah
                                                                                                          also simultaneously reflects the realities of the world. This paradox
                            £A Separate Book in the TorahA Separate Book in the TorahA Separate Book in the TorahA Separate Book in the TorahA Separate Book in the TorahA Separate Book in the Torah  was  discussed  extensively in our discussion of  Jacob’s complex
                                                                                                          character in a number of portions in Genesis. Since there are so many
                            ££££
                                                                                                          difficult situations in life that strain our sense of fairness, logic, and
                                                                                                          at times even our faith itself, we would expect to find situations in
               In the Torah portion of Beha’alotcha, we find a phenomenon that                            the Torah that also seem to defy explanation. In Korach, we discover
               occurs nowhere else in the entire Tanach: two sentences are bracketed                      that not only Korach and his assembly are swallowed up by the earth
               off from the rest of the text by two backward-facing and inverted                          but also their wives, children, and even infants. That these men’s
               Hebrew letters, two nuns, to be exact:                                                     wives and grown-up children somehow participated in the uprising

                 And when the ark would journey, Moses said: “Arise God and let                           cannot be entirely dismissed, yet it is initially difficult to understand
               your enemies be scattered, and let those that hate You flee from before                    what the tiny babies could have done to deserve such a death given
               You.” And when it [the ark] rested he would say: “Rest peacefully                          that they took no part whatsoever in the entire incident. To argue
               God among the myriad thousands of Israel.” (Numbers 10:35-36)                              that these infants had to die because they were of the same bloodline
                                                                                                          as the rebels is inherently difficult to reconcile with our innate sense
                 The first verse is recited in synagogues around the world when the
               ark is opened and the Torah removed for public readings, and the                           of justice. Furthermore, they had no opportunity to exercise their
               second verse is recited when the Torah is returned to the ark after                        free will so how could they be punished? Indeed, even arguing that
               having been read.                                                                          these infants were punished for their fathers’ sins is problematic as
                                                                                                          the Torah explicitly relates that God does not punish children for
                 Rashi, quoting the Talmud (Shabbat 115b-116a), first explains that                       their fathers’ sins.
               these two verses are set apart because they are out of chronological
               order. This, however, would not seem to be reason enough since Rashi                         One way to resolve this conundrum is to admit that free will,
               often explains that events recorded in the Torah are out of sequential                     though axiomatic in Jewish thought, is not as absolute as many
               order, and, indeed, this reasoning is also disputed by Rabbi Judah                         people think. Many factors including nature and nurture, the effect of
               Hanasi in the Talmud. Why then, according to the Talmud, do the                            previous lifetimes, peer pressure, societal limitations, and emotional
               nuns appear in this specific case? Rashi, offering a second Talmudic                       and psychological makeup all influence and create the parameters
               opinion, proposes that the Torah is separating two sets of sins that                       within which free will operates. Perhaps these infants’ souls were
               occurred in the desert, both of which are recorded in this portion.                        reincarnated for only a brief time to pay off some debts or undergo
                                                                                                          certain suffering to atone for their actions in a previous lifetime.
                 The Talmud also offers a third possibility, which Rashi does not
               mention: these two verses are set off  because they are actually a                           Alternatively, we might suggest that sometimes even though the
               completely separate book! In light of this proposal, the five books                        individual may be blameless, his or her fate is the result of either
               of Moses would actually be seven books, as the creation of this two-                       God meting out collective punishment or the collective destiny of the
               verse book splits the book of Numbers into three separate books. As                        world callously determining a single individual’s fate. For instance,
                                                                                                          in explaining God’s decision to flood the entire world in Noah’s time,

                                               452                                                                                                                               477                                                                                                      #                                                                                    24107

























































                                                                                               15














































                                                                                                                                                                                                 # 24107-EYAL - 24107-EYAL | 15 - A | 18-01-28 | 12:12:05 | SR:-- | Magenta  #24107-EYAL - 24107-EYAL | 15 - A | 18-01-28 | 12:12:05 | SR:-- | Yellow  24107-EYAL - 24107-EYAL | 15
   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457