Page 227 - 20818_park-B_efi

applies to medical mistakes, but to errors due to the physician not tient’s age an infection of the sinuses was not a reasonable diagnosis.
having studied the matter adequately, in which case he is obligated He gave different medications, which helped.
to pay. The Chida is also of the opinion that if the physician himself After looking into the first physician’s work, it became obvious that
admits he did not investigate the illness adequately, and gave medica- he is often negligent. Is one obligated to reveal this to his supervisors?
tions that harmed the patient, he is obligated to pay for the damages, Perhaps, since this will cause hatred on his part and a breakdown of
as we discussed at length above. the relationship with him - and he might possibly even try to take
According to this, if the first physician made a common error in revenge on the person who rebuked him - there is no obligation to
judgment, he is exempt in a human court but liable in a Heavenly rebuke him?
Court. But if he was negligent and did not study the case well, or did
not delve into it adequately, he is obligated to pay. Before answering the questions, let us discuss a third question. (For
And now to the question: Is one allowed to tell the patient that the obvious reasons identifying details have been changed.)
tooth was removed in haste? Speaking lashon hara is forbidden unless To the honorable Rav…shlit”a
for some benefit and only if all the conditions cited by Chafetz Chaim While doing the night shift in the hospital I was shocked to over-
above are present. If one of the conditions is missing, such as if the
second dentist thinks that the patient may not sue the first dentist hear the administrator hold a long private conversation with relatives
in the United States (meaning, using the hospital phone, at a time
or that the beis din will not declare the dentist liable, then there is no when overseas conversations were extremely expensive). If I point this
purpose in speaking badly. It would then be prohibited to relate the out, it will definitely cause tension in our relationship and between
negative information about the dentist.
us, and it is likely to cause me harm as well. Am I obligated despite
this to say something to him or report to his supervisors? Perhaps I
1 SuMMaRy and Conclusions am allowed to ignore his action, so that he not harm me?

Letoeles, it is permitted to relay the negative information. If there is no
benefit, it is forbidden. 1 AnsweR to Question 1

The Chafetz Chaim (Hilchos Rechilus #9) says: If a person is about to
hire a worker and someone recognizes him as a thief, it is a mitzvah for
him to reveal that to the prospective employer, because the Torah says
“Do not stand idly by the blood of your fellowman” (Vayikra 19:16).
So, too, if someone sees a woman about to become engaged to a man
with “serious defects,” and if she knew she would not marry him, one
is obligated to reveal this it to her. However, several conditions have
to be satisfied:

1. The defect is a serious physical ailment rather than a form of
weakness.

2. It is prohibited to exaggerate the illness.

248 1 Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein Notifying Authorities about deficiencies 2 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 8 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Magenta 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 8 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Cyan 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 8 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Black #

#

# 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 8 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Magenta #20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 8 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Yellow 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 8 - B | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Black 20818_efi