Page 70 - 20818_park-B_efi
P. 70

match, the questioner has to explain his reason for asking, so as not
                                                                                               to cause the other to speak lashon hara.

                                                                                                                          
                                                                                               Now, we can return to our discussion regarding a surgeon who mis-
                               AN EXPERT SURGEON
               32             MISHANDLED SURGERY:                                              takenly removed the wrong kidney. Is the physician obligated to pay
                                                                                               the woman for damages and for removing the wrong kidney? I believe
                              SHOULD HE HIMSELF FIX
                                                                                               the physician is exempt from paying for the injury, since he did no
                              THE DAMAGE OR SHOULD
                              ANOTHER, LESS EXPERT                                             damage but removed a cancerous kidney.
                              SURGEON, DO SO?                                                     It would seem that this story resembles the actions of  Rabban
                                                                                               Gamliel, who rejoiced greatly when he freed his servant by blinding
                                                                                               his eye. In fact, it is even better - because Rabban Gamliel was not
                                                                                               commanded to blind Tavi (although blinding him was a favor to him
                                                                                               because it freed him), while the physician unknowingly did a mitzvah
                                                                                               by removing the diseased kidney and saving the woman’s life. As the
                   1    Question                                                               Shaarei Deah (#56) writes, even according to the view that mitzvos
                                                                                               require intent, this rule only applies to mitzvos between man and G-d,
               A man suffering from an enlarged prostate was coming twice yearly               but not to those between man and his fellow. As it says in maseches
               to the hospital for tests. On one of his visits, the physician inserted         Bava Metzia (82b) even a lender who lends only because he needs the
               a cystoscope without adequate care, puncturing the urinary bladder              security item has performed a mitzvah.
               and injuring the large intestine. The physician immediately performed              Thus if the woman sues the surgeon, he is exempt from paying her.
               surgery. After fighting for his life for several weeks, the patient was         On the other hand, perhaps it would be correct for the authorities to
               finally out of danger.                                                          revoke the physician’s license or to punish him in another way for his
                  In order to correct the condition, the patient now needs additional          negligence in removing the left kidney instead of the right. Although
               surgery. The hospital administration nominated the same surgeon                 Hashem chose this physician as a good agent to save the woman’s life,
               who made the initial mistake to perform the surgery now. While he is            he is still responsible for the negligence. As it says in maseches Bava
               viewed as a senior and experienced surgeon, the patient has lost faith          Batra 21b, an expert [physician] can be fired without warning if he
               in him and requests that the surgery be performed by a different phy-           makes a mistake.
               sician, who is less of an expert. The family asked me for my opinion.              [The Maggid of Dubna asks about the grandsons of Haman who
               Which is preferable? What should I advise the patient?                          studied Torah in Bnei Brak (Gittin 57b): What did Haman do to
                                                                                               merit such grandsons? He answers with a parable. A prince once
                   1     AnsweR                                                                nearly choked on a bone stuck in his throat. An evil, heartless man
                                                                                               walked by and hit him on the back of his neck with the intention of
               We learned in maseches Bava Kamma (85a) that if one injures his                 killing him. To his surprise, the act saved the prince’s life by dislodg-
               fellowman he cannot treat him himself but is obligated to hire a phy-           ing the bone from his throat. The king sentenced the man to death for
               sician to treat and heal him. Several halachos are taught here:                 hitting his son, but since he ultimately saved the prince’s life, the king




        64               1  Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein                       Removed the Wrong Kidney  2                                      85                                                                                #                                                                                    20818
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75