Page 298 - 20818_park-c_efi
P. 298

not necessary to desecrate Shabbos, we do not listen to them and we                  However, it is not known to me that danger to the eye can cause
               desecrate Shabbos. Therefore, one should not circumcise the baby.                    a situation of danger to life. Therefore, I would like to know
                  The Avnei Nezer (Yoreh De’ah #320) writes: If the physician says                  whether it is permitted for the physician to desecrate Shabbos
               that even if the baby is in pain he will not be harmed by circumcision,              and to write. What is the halacha if the nurse, who as yet does
               we do not listen to him against the words of the Sages. But if he says               not observe Shabbos, is prepared to write in his place? Should he
               that the baby will not have pain, we circumcise him.                                 allow her to do so?
                  The Rambam (Hilchos Milah 1:18) writes: We do not circumcise a                  2.  Is it permissible to light a slit lamp (a special eye instrument to
               baby unless he has no illness of any kind, because danger to life sets               see into the eye) for patients who are not in danger but there is
               aside everything, and it is always possible to circumcise a baby later               a possibility that they are in danger of losing an eye?
               but one cannot restore one lost life of Israel to the world. The Avnei
               Nezer (Orach Chaim, Vol. 2 #453-454) wonders why the Rambam                          At times, the Shabbos-observant physician who is on duty in
               saw it necessary to write that “it is always possible to circumcise a                the eye department on Shabbos morning asks his colleagues who
               baby later.” After all, this does not have to come into account when                 were on duty on Friday night to leave the light on, and when
               we are dealing with pikuach nefesh. He explains that it is a far-fetched             he arrives he finds it was turned off, and his colleagues want to
               possibility that the baby will become endangered due to pain in his                  light it for him. Should he stop them from doing so?
               eyes. Nonetheless, since one can always circumcise him at a later time,
               we take into account even the minute chance that the pain in his eye,               1    AnsweR
               combined with the danger of circumcision, will endanger his life. A
               person has the right to be stringent in a situation that endangers him-         It is written in Tractate Avodah Zarah (28b): If an eye is disengaged,
               self, but when it comes to the baby, we have no right to increase the           it is permissible to treat it with kchol on Shabbos and to prepare med-
               danger and circumcise him.                                                      ical ingredients and carry them through a public thoroughfare. Since
                  I heard that they asked this question of the author of Dovev Meis-           this is a danger to life, one violates biblical prohibitions on Shabbos in
               harim of Tchebin zt”l: Why do we wait seven days after the fever has            order to heal it.
               subsided? According to the physicians, once the fever recedes there is             In the  Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chaim #328:9) it is written:  If
               no harm in doing any sort of surgical procedure. Our eyes have seen             one has pain in the eyes… or his eye is tearing because of the pain,
               that this is true. He answered, with great wisdom: Our eyes can only            or blood was flowing from the eye, or there was mucus or a sharp
               see what happens a short time after the circumcision. We do not have            inflammation in the eye, we desecrate Shabbos in order to heal him.
               the capacity to see what will happen fifty years after the circumcision.        The Mishnah Berurah writes (ibid s.k.22), that although for danger
                  Similarly, the Chikrei Lev (Orach Chaim, Vol. 2, end of #109, p.             to a limb or organ we usually do not desecrate Shabbos with Torah
               231a) challenges the words of the  Rambam (Mishnah commentary,                  prohibitions, the eye is different, because the eye is connected to the
               Yoma, Ch. 8), who writes that it is dangerous for a child to fast. The          heart, Rashi explains (Avodah Zarah 28b) that eyesight is intricately
               Chikrei Lev testifies that he saw children fasting, and it did not harm         tied to the heart. This means that danger to the eye is danger to lthe
               them. The Yad David (Zontzheim, Yoma 82a, s.v. Rashi) responds:                 heart, which is a danger to life. In view of the above, it is permitted to
               Who says that it is not dangerous for them after some time? Do all              desecrate Shabbos for danger to the eye, because any danger of blind-
               things that we permit because of danger have to involve immediate               ness may affect the heart.




        284              1  Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein                       Shabbos in an Ophthalmology Department  2                       297
   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303