Page 301 - 20818_park-c_efi
P. 301

20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 10 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:25 | SR:-- | Cyan
 20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 10 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:25 | SR:-- | Black
 #20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 10 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:25 | SR:-- | Yellow
 20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 10 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:25 | SR:-- | Magenta
 #
 other sins, for violating Shabbos is compared to idolatry. Therefore,   10  in circumcision is the wound. According to this, it would also be dan-
 it is prohibited to violate a Torah prohibition on Shabbos in order to   gerous to test the blood of a baby whose eyes hurt, and I believe that
 save an organ or limb. The introduction to Eglei Tal states something   nowadays physicians do this regularly. Perhaps even though testing
 similar to the Pri Megadim, but their words require clarification. On   the blood of a baby who is sick is slightly dangerous, it is permissible
 the basis of the fact that Shabbos is compared to idolatry, it would be   to do so in order to heal the baby. However, for the mitzvah of circum-
 prohibited to desecrate Shabbos even for pikuach nefesh. If Shabbos is   cision, Hakadosh Baruch Hu, did not command us to place the baby in
 not similar to idolatry, then even for danger of an organ or limb one   the slightest chance of danger.
 should permit violating the Shabbos prohibitions. How do we explain
 this?         1    SuMMaRy and Conclusion
 According to this view, the desecration of Yom Tov for danger to
 an organ or limb is permitted, since only Shabbos and not Yom Tov is   It is forbidden to circumcise a baby who has an eye infection be-
 compared to idolatry. See the general introduction (of the Pri Megad-  cause of the possibility of danger. There are no factors in this issue
 im to Hilchos Shabbos, s.v. od) where there is a discussion on whether   other than the words of our Sages, who determined that this is dan-
 or not Yom Kippur resembles Shabbos in this respect. It is permitted   gerous.
 from the Torah to desecrate Yom Tov for healing purposes even for a
 patient who is not dangerously ill because healing resembles prepara-
 tion of food to be eaten, as explained in the Ran (Beitzah 11b, from the
 pages of the Rif, s.v. kee), and if so, it is obvious that it is permissible
 to desecrate Yom Tov if an organ or limb is endangered. Nonetheless
 I have already written in the name of my father-in-law, Rav Y. S. El-
 yashiv zt”l, that according to the Ran, who explains that the reason
 why it is permissible to put blue dye on the eye on the second day
 of Yom Tov, is because of machshirei ochel nefesh (things that enable
 food to be eaten on Yom Tov), one cannot do prohibitions on Yom
 Tov if the healing effect will only be felt on the morrow, just as it is
 forbidden to cook on Yom Tov for the weekday. However, regarding
 the issue of danger to a limb, it is permissible, since it is permissible to
 transgress a prohibition in order to save an organ or limb.
 We must also deliberate if it is permissible for a father to instruct
 his young son to perform a prohibited act on Shabbos in order to save
 an organ or limb. Rabbenu Chananel is cited by the Achiezer (Vol. 3,
 #81:23) who writes in answer to the difficulty posed by the Mutzal
 Me’eish (cited in Gilyon Hashas, Yevamos 114a) that the Torah wrote a
 special prohibition of “your son” on Shabbos, even though it is in fact
 forbidden to encourage a child to actively perform any prohibition




 294   1  Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein  Circumcision with an Eye Infection  2   287
   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306