Page 13 - Straive eBook: Redefining Your Peer Review Experience
P. 13

Straive  |   Redefining Your Peer Review Experience  13














                        Soundness                        Novelty                     Clarifications
                   • Is the literature review     • Does the research            • A list of changes that
                      comprehensive?                 address an important           would improve the
                   • Is the hypothesis well          question?                      article
                      stated?                     • Does the research add        • Confidential comments
                   • Is the research                 to the body of                 to the Editor, including
                      methodologically               knowledge on its               ethical concerns
                      sound?                         subject?                    • Recommendation
                   • Have appropriate
                      statistical tools been
                      applied to the results?



                 Figure 6.
                 A simplified peer review report structure




            An alternative to report forms is direct              “I don’t think there are
            annotation of the article, in much the same             hard and fast rules on
            way as proofs during production can be                  the reviewing process
            annotated for correction. Direct annotation
            may be valued by reviewers who prefer to                structures. The 1+2
            comment on articles as they read, but systems    practice is common
            which require an internet connection do have            in my area and is there
            drawbacks for researchers who have unstable             to ensure more than
            or low-speed internet connections, either
            because of their location or because they               one-side evaluation is
            choose to review on the move. Offline                   taken into account and
            synchronisation is a potential solution to              that the editor is able
            this issue.
                                                                    to make a final decision
            The purpose of a peer review report is to               when the two peer
            enable the editor to make a decision based              reviewers disagree.
            on objective assessments of the article. While
            two reviewers plus an editor is a commonly              It works most of the
            accepted standard, with the tools available             times but it has obvious
            today, it may be time to question whether both          trade-offs (e.g. slow
            with the tools available today, it may be time to       timescale).”
            question whether both reviewers must be
            human. Could machine learning technology                Dr Franco Zappettini, Lecturer
            provide the necessary objective assessment of   Department of Communication and Media
                                                                    at the University of Liverpool
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18