Page 59 - laten-08-06-2020

Jesus even though he found no guilt in him. But in order to
appease public hostility he pardoned revolutionary Barabbas.
Also he persisted his intention to crucify the innocent Jesus
what the crowd offered as a poignant choice.

But Pilate’s wife who like the gentiles in the birth narrative (2:12)
was warned (by God) in a dream and that message was passed
on to Pilate while he was sitting on the judgment seat. Pilate
accepted this divine warning and refused to take responsibility
for Jesus’ death. So, he had to give the formal verdict, by washing
his hands. He disclaimed responsibility for Jesus’ death and
transferred it to the crowd and in the terrible words of v25 all
the people accepted it. Mathew indicates that while the chief
priests and elders had taken the initiative, the people as a whole
carried a corporate responsibility for the death of Jesus.
Another important thing to note here is that the function
of the passage is primarily theological rather than historical. Its
intention is not to report that Jesus was sentenced to crucifixion
by the Roman procurator but to exhibit the theological
conviction that Israel, the Messiah’s own people, assumed
full responsibility for his death and therefore warranted the
judgment of Mathew21:43.

Hence, re-imaging the character of Pilate helps us to
understand how he has been encountered and experienced the
cross in his own particular context. His encounter with the cross
helped him to fulfill God’s will in the life and ministry of Jesus.
His experience with the cross helped him to be a part of his
suffering by rendering injustice to Jesus under the outspoken
crowd with the political motive.

Morality of the Cross

In our Indian political context the so called majority
powerful insist their political and social agenda and eliminates
the peaceful co-existence of the minority. Whatever the
politically powerful will decide the powerless has to follow and

53
Lenten Meditations Re - Imaging People