Page 23 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 23

between climate change risk consider-  ■   Reduction in capital availability.  The SEC recognizes these issues
         ations and financial reporting.8    Each of these risks could have major   and is focusing more on ESG reporting.
           The TCFD framework takes a      implications to a business. Resource allo-  Then-Acting Chair Allison Herren Lee
         traditional approach of including both   cations a company can make to mitigate   in March 2021 called for comments,
         risk and opportunity in a company’s   potential negative outcomes may merit   noting that the SEC is planning on
         planning process. The report categorizes   substantial investment.   updating its reporting requirements for
         risk into “transition risks” and “physical                          public companies.11 Issues the SEC is
         risks.” Transition risks are uncertainties   Financial accounting   seeking to address include:
         a company faces as overall economies   considerations               ■   How to provide more consistent,
         move from the current state of activities   The TCFD links its recommendations   comparable, and reliable information
         and emissions toward reductions to ad-  and environmental strategy to existing   to investors while also providing
         dress global climate challenges. Within   accounting standards. Both the Inter-  greater clarity on expectations of
         transition risks, the TCFD identifies   national Accounting Standards Board   registrants; and
         policy and legal, technology, market, and   (IASB) and FASB have issued standards   ■   How, if at all, should registrants
         reputation outcomes as potential impacts   to address risks and uncertainties affect-  disclose their internal governance and
         on companies.                     ing companies. The TCFD report states:  oversight of climate-related issues?
           Considerations regarding VCOs                                       Companies that are proactive in mov-
         could fall in any of the underlying cat-  The disclosures of both contingen-  ing toward and reaching net-zero emis-
         egories, but, in particular, VCOs fit into   cies and management’s assessment   sions combined with effective reporting
         the reputation category (nonvoluntary   and evaluation of long-lived assets for   may reap a number of benefits. As noted
         compliance offsets would likely fall into   potential impairment are critically   above, these businesses may have an
         the policy and legal group). The report   important in assisting stakeholders in   advantage in obtaining capital, attract-
         defines the reputational risk of climate   understanding an organization’s abil-  ing customers, recruiting and retaining
         change during transition as “tied to   ity to meet future reported earnings   employees, avoiding supply chain disrup-
         changing customer or community per-  and cash flow goals.10         tions, and other benefits. The approach is
         ceptions of an organization’s contribu-                             not currently a mandate; however, these
         tion to or detraction from the transition   The discussion implies that the   considerations will likely continue to in-
         to a lower-carbon economy.”9      expenses are maintained to protect   centivize firms to implement VCOs and
           The report identifies potential nega-  reputational capital.      other climate-related strategies.
         tive outcomes resulting from reputa-  In most G20 jurisdictions, compa-
         tional damage:                    nies with public debt or equity have   Tax deductibility or
         ■   Shifts in consumer preferences;   a legal obligation to disclose material   capitalization: Secs. 162
         ■   Stigmatization of sector;     risks in their financial reports — in-  and 263
         ■   Increased stakeholder concern or   cluding material climate-related risks.   The above considerations must be put
           negative stakeholder feedback;  However, the absence of a standardized   into the context of income tax principles
         ■   Reduced revenue from decreased   framework for disclosing climate-  to determine deductibility of these
           demand for goods/services;      related financial risks makes it dif-  resource allocations. For instance, the
         ■   Reduced revenue from decreased   ficult for organizations to determine   amounts paid for VCOs must meet the
           production capacity (e.g., delayed   what information should be included   requirements to be currently deductible
           planning approvals, supply chain   in their filings and how it should be   expenses under Sec. 162 or as capitaliz-
           interruptions);                 presented. Even when reporting similar   able expenses under Sec. 263.
         ■   Reduced revenue from negative   climate-related information, disclosures   Sec. 162 requires an expense incurred
           impacts on workforce management   are often difficult to compare due to   in carrying on a trade or business to be
           and planning (e.g., employee attrac-  variances in mandatory and volun-  “ordinary and necessary” to qualify for
           tion and retention); and        tary frameworks.                  potential deductibility. An expense is


          8.  Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. Final Report: Recom-  11.  SEC, public statement by Lee (now a commissioner), “Public Input Wel-
            mendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (June   comed on Climate Change Disclosures” (March 15, 2021), available at
            2017), p. 8, available at tinyurl.com/4ey3232p.    tinyurl.com/yn3dwpay.
          9.  Id., p. 6.
         10.  Id., p. 37.



         www.thetaxadviser.com                                                                January 2022  21
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28