Page 242 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 242

TAX CLINIC



         allocable to a single state (in the case of   from intangibles unless the intangible is   calculation and there is no applicable
         nonbusiness income derived from the   a government license, geographic license   exception (e.g., the treasury function
         sale of intangible personal property, this   (e.g., cable TV, FCC), etc.   provisions discussed above), the
         is generally the taxpayer’s state of com-  To the extent a particular state   majority of states require taxpayers to
         mercial domicile).                includes gross receipts from the sale, as-  assign their revenue using the most
                                           signment, or licensing of intangible prop-  specific information possible. To make
         Apportionment and revenue         erty in the sales factor (e.g., California),   this process easier, many states have
         assignment                        determining the amount of total gross   issued guidance on how to assign (or
         Apportionment is the method by which   receipts to include in the denominator   source) gross receipts from sales of
         multistate taxpayers divide their incomes   is relatively straightforward. However,   intangible property. California, for
         or losses among the various states in   determining the amount of gross receipts   example, requires taxpayers to assign
         which they have a taxable presence.   to include in the numerator (i.e., the sales   gross receipts from sales of intangible
         The states are free to develop their own   attributable to any particular state) can   property to California to the extent
         apportionment methodologies as long as   be complex because revenue assignment   the property is used in California (Cal.
         those methodologies pass constitutional   rules vary by state.      Code Regs. tit. 18, §25136-2(d)(1)).
         muster. The majority of the states                                    Taxpayers are required to determine
         apply a single sales factor method of   California as an illustration  the “location of the use” by using a
         apportionment, which means the state   For example, California “sales” gener-  cascading set of rules. First, if there
         taxes a share of the corporation’s total   ally include gross receipts from the sale,   is a contract between the parties that
         profit that is based on the share of the   assignment, or licensing of intangible   indicates that the property is used in
         corporation’s nationwide sales occurring   personal property (see Cal. Code Regs.   California at the time of the sale, use
         in that state. Some states, however,   tit. 18, §25134(a)(1)(E)). But California   of the property is presumed to be in
         continue to use a multifactor formula   taxpayers should first consider how they   California (Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18,
         that considers the multistate taxpayer’s   are using their investments in cryp-  §25136-2(d)(1)(A)). If there is no
         property and payroll as well as sales.   toassets before automatically including   contract, or if the taxpayer overcomes
         Multifactor formulas can be weighted in   such receipts in their California sales   the presumption that the property is
         a variety of ways (e.g., equally weighted,   factor. Specifically, taxpayers may ex-  used in California, the location of the
         double-weighted sales, etc.). As state   clude from their California sales factor   use must be reasonably approximated
         taxation is trending toward the single   “interest and dividends from intangible   (Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18, §25136-2(d)
         sales factor method of apportionment   assets held in connection with a treasury   (1)(B)). Finally, if the location of the
         and considering that payroll and property   function of the taxpayer’s unitary busi-  use cannot be reasonably approximated,
         factors are not generally affected by   ness as well as the gross receipts and   the location of the use is in California
         intangible property, the remainder of this   overall net gains from the maturity,   if the purchaser’s billing address is in
         discussion focuses on how cryptoasset   redemption, sale, exchange or other   California (Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18,
         transactions are treated for sales factor   disposition of such intangible assets”   §25136-2(d)(1)(C)).
         apportionment purposes.           (Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18, §25137(c)(1)  In the context of a single sale of
           The sales factor for any particular state   (D), emphasis added). For this purpose,   cryptoassets made to a known purchaser,
         is a fraction consisting of the taxpayer’s   a taxpayer’s “treasury function” is the   California would likely deem the
         sales attributable to that state in the   “pooling, management, and investment   “location of the use” to be in California
         numerator and the taxpayer’s total sales in   of intangible assets for the purpose   if the purchaser is located in California.
         the denominator. What constitutes “sales”   of satisfying the cash flow needs of   Unfortunately, cryptoasset transactions
         for this purpose varies by state. Several   the trade or business, such as provid-  seldom occur that way. Rather, the
         states have updated their definitions   ing liquidity for a taxpayer’s business   majority of cryptoasset transactions
         of “sales” or “gross receipts” (based on   cycle, providing a reserve for business   occur through exchanges where buyers
         changes to the Multistate Tax Compact   contingencies, business acquisitions,   and sellers very rarely know each other.
         definition) to (1) include only receipts   etc. … [and] includes the use of futures   The revenue assignment analysis
         from transactions in the regular course of   contracts and options contracts to hedge   becomes much more challenging in this
         the taxpayer’s trade or business, except (2)   foreign currency fluctuations” (id.).  scenario where there are no contracts
         excluding receipts from hedging transac-  If taxpayers must generally include   between the buyers and sellers and
         tions and/or treasury operations, and,   gross receipts from sales of intangible   where there is an intended degree
         importantly here, (3) excluding receipts   personal property in their sales factor   of anonymity.



         24  May 2022                                                                         The Tax Adviser
   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247