Page 383 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 383

TAX TRENDS




           The Tax Court found two problems   the power to do what DelPonte con-  decide the underlying issues. It seems
         with this argument. The first was that   tended it should. It observed that   probable that, unless the OCC has a
         her premise was faulty. According to the   while the court under Sec. 6213(a) has   very convincing argument as to why
         court, requiring CCISO to have the op-  exclusive jurisdiction to redetermine a   DelPonte should be held liable for the
         portunity to issue a final determination   taxpayer’s deficiency for a tax year    taxes caused by Goddard’s misdeeds, the
         in cases where the requesting spouse   when the taxpayer receives a valid    Tax Court, in light of CCISO’s determi-
         raises an innocent-spouse claim for    deficiency notice and timely files a    nation, will hold that she is entitled to
         the first time in a petition for redetermi-  petition for redetermination, under    innocent-spouse relief.
         nation of a deficiency would not guar-  Sec. 7803(b)(2)(D), the Chief Counsel   DelPonte, 158 T.C. No. 7 (2022)   ■
         antee that all spouses be treated equally,   has the authority to litigate cases for
         regardless of when they request relief.   the IRS before the Tax Court. The court
         Instead, it would merely make     held it could not undo this statutoWry   Contributors
         taxpayers who requested innocent-  scheme in the name of fairness.
                                                                               James A. Beavers, CPA, CGMA, J.D.,
         spouse relief in CDP hearings the
         ones treated differently, rather than    Reflections                  LL.M., is The Tax Adviser’s tax techni-
                                                                               cal content manager. Paul Bonner
         taxpayers who requested relief in a    While DelPonte did not get the
                                                                               is The Tax Adviser’s senior news
         petition for redetermination of   immediate relief she was looking for
                                                                               writer. For more information
         a deficiency.                     through her motion, it is entirely likely
                                                                               about this column, contact
           The second and more important   she will still be found to be an innocent
                                                                               thetaxadviser@aicpa.org.
         problem the court found with this    spouse. Although the court denied her
         argument was that it did not have    motion for entry of decision, it did not












            Welcome to



            the age of



            specialization.




            When you become a member of an AICPA  specialized section,
                                                 ®
            you’re joining an elite community of like-minded peers. You’re also giving
            yourself high-quality, curated content, free CPE and webcasts on hot topics, delivered
            by the sharpest minds in the profession. Most of all, you’ll get the needed support
            to flourish and grow.
             Learn more or join today: aicpa.org/sections

             © 2021 Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. All rights reserved. 2103-62839


          2103-62839 Section Ads_CMYK.indd   2                                                      4/29/21   9:40 AM

         52  July 2022                                                                        The Tax Adviser
   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388