Page 562 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 562

TAX CLINIC




         determined that Reserve’s risk had not   Facts                      was ineffective because Sub was not a
         been distributed among unrelated par-  On date 1, a parent company (X)   corporation as defined by Regs. Sec.
         ties and, therefore, was not sufficiently   formed a subsidiary (Sub) as a limited   301.7701-2(b). Therefore, X had failed
         distributed (id. at 46).          liability company in state 1, and Sub   because it did not meet all the require-
                                           elected to be treated as a partnership   ments of Sec. 1361(b)(3)(B). On date
         Takeaways from Reserve            for federal income tax purposes. Sub’s   5, X sold some of its interest in Sub to
         The taxpayer in Reserve was unsuc-  operating agreement included partner-  a third party.
         cessful in satisfying the distribution-  ship provisions that applied regardless   From date 2 to date 4, all distribu-
         of-risk criteria primarily because   of whether X was a partnership. On   tions and liquidation proceeds were
         its stop-loss insurer, PoolRe, was   date 2, Sub made an S corporation elec-  identical, and the shareholders and Sub
         deemed to not be a bona fide insur-  tion; however, due to Sub’s operating   had consistently filed tax returns as an
         ance company. In Reserve, the court   agreement having allowed dispropor-  S corporation. Moreover, Sub did not
         used the nine factors as a guideline   tionate distribution and liquidation   change the agreement’s provisions de-
         and found that PoolRe failed to oper-  proceeds, the election became inef-  spite not being an S corporation. Fur-
         ate as a proper insurance company   fective under Sec. 1362(b)(1)(D). Sub   ther, X stated that the circumstances
         and, thus, was not a bona fide insur-  requested relief from a termination of   that led to both the S corporation and
         ance company.                     its S election under Sec. 1362(f) due to   QSub elections’ becoming ineffective
            The holding in Reserve illustrates   having more than one class of stock.   were inadvertent, not the result of tax
         the importance the court has placed   On date 3, Sub’s shareholders   avoidance or retroactive tax planning.
         on the nine factors in determining   formed X in state 2, and on date 4, Sub   In the ruling request, the shareholders
         whether a reinsurer, when used as   made X a wholly owned subsidiary of   and Sub agreed to any required adjust-
         a vehicle for distributing risk, is a   Sub by contributing all the stock in   ments by the IRS under Sec. 1362(f)
         bona fide insurance company. In light   Sub to X in a purported reorganization   consistent with the treatment of Sub on
         of this, it is recommended that tax   under Sec. 368(a)(1)(F). This would   date 2 as an S corporation and on date
         professionals’ clients that have captive   have resulted in X’s being treated as   4 as a QSub.
         insurance companies take great care to   the successor S corporation to Sub for
         distribute risk properly. If a taxpayer   federal tax purposes without having   Legal principles
         wishes to distribute risk by insuring   to make a new S election, pursuant to   Sec. 1361(b)(2) provides that financial
         other, unrelated parties, the taxpayer   Rev. Rul. 2008-18. Since Sub’s original   institutions that use the reserve method
         should make certain the insurance   S election was ineffective, Sub became   for bad debts, taxable insurance com-
         vehicle used meets most, if not all, the   a disregarded entity for federal income   panies, or domestic international sales
         above factors to ensure it is a bona fide   tax purposes. X therefore made an S   corporations (DISCs) or former DISCs
         insurance company.                corporation election, effective on date 3.  are ineligible to be a small business cor-
            From Terrance J. Pak, J.D., MBA,   On date 4, X filed an election to   poration under Subchapter S. Under Sec.
         Irvine, Calif.                    treat Sub as a QSub, but the election   1361(b)(1), a small business corporation


         S Corporations

         IRS applies Sec. 1362(f)
         to relieve inadvertent
         terminations of S and QSub
         elections

         In IRS Letter Ruling 202219005,
         released May 13, 2022, the Service
         addressed a consolidated corpora-
         tion’s request to apply Sec. 1362(f)                                                                    PHOTO BY SIMON MCGILL/GETTY IMAGES
         to provide relief from termination of
         the corporation’s subsidiary’s S cor-
         poration and qualified Subchapter S
         subsidiary (QSub) elections.



         20  November 2022                                                                    The Tax Adviser
   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567