Page 565 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 565

make clear that the FTB is broadening
         its view of what constitutes business   The company’s mere promise to pay was not
         income for individual nonresidents, the
         gain from which must be sourced at   sufficient to consider the liability fixed since
         least in part to California.        all of the events to establish the fact of the
           From Yukari Takahashi, CPA,
         Los Angeles                       liability did not occur during the year the offer
                                                                    was made.

         Tax Accounting
                                             Sec. 461(a) states that deductions   not earn enough sales incentives during
         All-events test for sales         and credits must be taken in the proper   the specified period to equal at least the
         incentives — one perspective      tax year, according to the taxpayer’s   amount of the guaranteed minimum
         The IRS, through Technical Advice   method of accounting used to de-  payment. Given both of these facts, the
         Memorandum (TAM) 202121010, has   termine taxable income. Under the   IRS concluded that the first prong of
         clarified when the all-events test of   accrual method, taxpayers can deduct   the all-events test was not met.
         Sec. 461 is met for an accrual-method   an expense if the liability meets the all-  To pass the second prong of the all-
         taxpayer that promised to pay sales   events test as described in Sec. 461(h)   events test, the amount of the liability has
         incentives to third-party distributors.   and Regs. Sec. 1.461-1(a)(2)(i). The   to be determined with reasonable accu-
         The IRS concluded that the liability   all-events test is met when (1) all the   racy. It is not necessary to know the exact
         generated from the sales incentives is   events have occurred that establish the   amount, so long as the liability has been
         incurred under the all-events test in the   fact of the liability; (2) the amount of   incurred and the amount is determined
         tax year the incentives are earned, not   the liability can be determined with   with reasonable accuracy. A liability is
         in the tax year of the taxpayer’s promise   reasonable accuracy; and (3) economic   not deductible if it is contingent or based
         to pay.                           performance has occurred with respect   upon an estimate if the events in question
           To incentivize a third-party distribu-  to the liability. Sec. 461(h)(1) states that   have not occurred by the end of the tax
         tor to make additional purchases of   the all-events test shall not be treated   year, no matter how statistically certain
         the taxpayer’s product before year end,   as met any earlier than when economic   (General Dynamics Corp., 481 U.S. 239
         the manufacturing and distribution   performance with respect to that item   (1987)). Here, the taxpayer’s guaranteed
         company made an offer guaranteeing a   occurs. Applying the all-events test to   minimum payment is not payable unless
         minimum sales incentive payment for   the facts and circumstances of the tax-  the distributor makes sales of the inven-
         sales of products in the distributor’s in-  payer’s sales incentive offer clarifies the   tory in year 2. Given that the event neces-
         ventory at the end of year 1, which were   IRS’s decision.          sary to determine the liability did not
         sold during a specified period in the   Generally, all events have occurred   occur during year 1, the IRS concluded
         subsequent year 2. The minimum pay-  to establish the fact of a liability when   that the second prong of the all-events
         ment applied only if the distributor did   (1) the event fixing the liability oc-  test also was not met.
         not earn sales incentives in the specified   curs, whether that is the required   Additional sections of the TAM
         period equaling at least the amount of   performance or other event, or (2) the   provide guidance about the economic
         the guaranteed minimum. The offer   payment is unconditionally due. The   performance requirement for the liability
         was made in writing a few days before   taxpayer’s sales incentive offer here   in question. A sales incentive is in effect a
         the end of the taxpayer’s fiscal year   was contingent upon the distributor’s   rebate. Regs. Sec. 1.461-4(g)(3) provides
         to encourage additional purchases of   selling at least one unit of product   that economic performance as it relates
         products. The taxpayer’s position was   from its ending inventory of year 1 in   to liabilities of rebates, refunds, or other
         that its promise in writing to pay a   the subsequent year 2. Given that the   payments occurs as payment is made to
         guaranteed minimum of sales incentives   sales could not occur until year 2 to be   the person to which the liability is owed.
         to distributors in the following year met   eligible for the incentive, the event(s)   However, a recurring-item exception to
         the all-events test, allowing the taxpayer   fixing the liability did not occur during   this general rule of economic performance
         to deduct the guaranteed minimum as   year 1. Additionally, the sales incentive   described in Regs. Sec. 1.461-5(b)(1)
         a reduction of gross receipts in the tax   offer stated that the taxpayer was not   applies if:
         year the offer was made, not the year the   obligated to make the guaranteed mini-  1.  At the end of the tax year, all events
         incentive was paid.               mum payment unless the distributor did   have occurred that establish the fact



         www.thetaxadviser.com                                                              November 2022  23
   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570