Page 593 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 593

standards where a lower or no standard   members who already are aware of   possesses the necessary competence
         otherwise exists.                 and abide by Circular 230 and the   to practice. Based on the discussions,
           SSTS 4 does generally follow    AICPA Code. It is recommended that   members agreed that quality is a key
         familiar concepts for experienced   members read through and familiarize   market differentiator in their practices;
         tax practitioners. First, members can   themselves with the new standard,   however, its implementation is incon-
         represent taxpayers in an issue they do   identify any parts of their practice to   sistent, and the environment in which
         not have direct experience with, but   which the standard is relevant, and   members operate is dynamic.
         they are expected to take steps to obtain  ensure current practice is in line with   Therefore, the AICPA is inviting
         technical competence as part of that   the new standard.            members and stakeholders to comment
         representation engagement. Second,                                  on the questions raised in an Invitation
         members are expected to comply with   Invitation to comment         to Comment. The task force and the
         all other relevant professional and   One of the aims of the AICPA Code is   TEC will consider all comments in de-
         regulatory obligations in providing   to protect the public interest. Paragraph   termining the best approach to address
         representation services, such as Circular   .01 of “The Public Interest” interpreta-  quality within the tax function.
         230 and the AICPA Code of Professional   tion (ET §0.300.030) states: “Members
         Conduct (the AICPA Code). Third,   should accept the obligation to act in a   Comments
         members are expected to maintain   way that will serve the public interest,   As this is the first major update to
         integrity and professionalism in dealing   honor the public trust, and demonstrate   the SSTSs in more than 10 years, the
         with tax authority representatives.   a commitment to professionalism.”   AICPA realizes many members will
         Fourth, members are expected to, with   Members are expected to provide   have questions and concerns. For this
         taxpayer approval, respond timely to   quality services in a manner that dem-  reason, the standards are being exposed
         tax authority requests for information.   onstrates a level of professionalism   for an extended period through Dec.
         Fifth, members are advised to refer   consistent with those goals.  31, 2022, to allow as many comments
         any situations in which there may   As part of the process to update the   and questions as possible to be addressed.
         be fraudulent or criminal taxpayer   SSTSs, the task force held extensive   Please send any comments and questions
         activity to legal counsel and withdraw   discussions around the importance of   on the revisions to the SSTSs and the
         from further representation. And   additional concepts with the potential   Invitation to Comment using our online
         sixth, members are expected to review   to significantly impact the tax practice   form. Alternatively, members may email
         documents or computations from an   of the future. A resonating theme   their submission to SSTScomments@
         examination for correctness, discussing   emerged in many discussions related   aicpa-cima.com. All comments received
         the results with the taxpayer.    to quality management in tax, defined   will be considered. Thank you for your
           Application of this standard will   as a proactive, risk-based, scalable ap-  attention to this important change for
         generally require little action for most   proach to ensure that an individual firm   tax practitioners.   ■



           SSTS Revision Task Force members                                    Contributors

           ■   David J. Holets (chair), Crowe LLP, Indianapolis                David J. Holets, CPA, is a partner and
           ■   Lea A. Fletcher, KPMG LLP, Charlotte, N.C.                      leader of tax quality control functions at
           ■   Nicholas M. Preusch, YHB CPAs & Consultants, Fredericksburg, Va.  Crowe LLP in Indianapolis. Stephen P.
                                                                               Valenti, CPA, is professor emeritus of
           ■   Thomas J. Purcell III, Creighton University, Omaha, Neb.
                                                                               accounting at New York University. Mr.
           ■   Heidi A. Ridgeway, Grant Thornton LLP, Chicago                  Holets is chair of the AICPA Tax Practice
           ■   Stephanie S. Saunders, Saunders & Saunders PC, Virginia Beach, Va.  Responsibilities Committee and the
           ■   Gerard H. Schreiber Jr., Schreiber & Schreiber CPAs, Metairie, La.  SSTS Revision Tax Force, and Mr. Valenti
           ■   Norma J. Schrock, Ernst & Young LLP, Washington, D.C.           is a member of the AICPA Tax Practice
                                                                               Responsibilities Committee. For more
           ■   Joseph J. Tapajna, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Ind.   information on this column, contact
           ■   Christopher J. Wittich, Boyum Barenscheer PLLP, Bloomington, Minn.  thetaxadviser@aicpa.org.
           ■   Henry J. Grzes (staff liaison), AICPA, Durham, N.C.




         www.thetaxadviser.com                                                              November 2022  51
   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598