Page 93 - REMOVABLE ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES
P. 93

Class  III malocclusions  85
                 Retention                              by  the  addition  of cold-cured  acrylic,  either  to
                                                        cover  palatal  springs  and  contact  the  incisors,
                 The  necessary  length  of retention  will  depend  or to  lock a screw  into the  open position.
                 upon the depth of overbite at the completion of   In some cases, particularly a lingually occlud-
                 treatment.  A  corrected  incisor  crossbite  with  ing lateral incisor, it  is  possible  to  increase the
                 increased  overbite at the end of treatment  may  overbite and to reduce reliance on the retainers
                 require  little  or no retention. The  first  stage  of  by  adding composite  to  the  incisal  edge  of the
                 retention  in  most  cases  will  be  to  remove  the  incisor to  help  maintain  the corrected  overjet.
                 molar  capping.  At  the  following  visit  the
                 patient  is instructed to wear the appliance on  a
                 nights-only  basis  for  a further 2 months.   Further reading
                   Where  the  overbite  is  reduced,  retention
                 should  be  maintained  for  longer.  If a  screw  or  Nerder, P.H., Bakke, M.. Solow. B. (1999) The functional
                 springs  have  been  used  to  correct  the  incisors  shift  of the  mandible  in  unilateral posterior crossbite.
                 and the overbite is reduced, it is often advisable   European Journal of Orthodontics. 21:  155-166
                 to  make  a separate  retainer  such  as  a  conven-  Ninou,  S.,  Stephens,  C D .  (1994) The early treatment of
                 tional  appliance  with  a  'U'  loop  labial  bow  -  posterior crossbite - current understanding of continu-
                 specifically  to  hold  the  incisors  in  their  new  ing controversies. Dental Update, 21: 420-426
                                                        Stephens, CD., Jenkins. C.G.B. (1988) Crown modification
                 position.  Where  this  seems  unnecessary,  it  is
                                                          using  composite  resin  to  achieve  incisor  overbite.
                 possible to make the previous appliance passive
                                                          British Journal of Orthodontics, 4:  121-122.
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98