Page 4 - KZN Business Sense 5.2
P. 4

WHAT’S THE VERDICT?




        Lazelle Paola, Partner, Cox Yeats Attorneys  however suspended for a period   4.  The fact that the rules provide
                                      of twelve months to afford        additional contractual
              he question whether     the homeowners association       requirements for the operation
              a residential estate’s   an opportunity to obtain the      of vehicles on the roads in the
        Troads may or may not         necessary authorisations and/     estate does not mean that the
        be controlled by its governing   or consents under the National      rules have a public law content
        homeowners association has    Road Traffic Act, 93 of 1998.   5.  There is no need for the
        finally been answered. On     The homeowners association       homeowners association to
        28 March 2019, the Supreme    was granted leave to appeal the      seek authority from the MEC
        Court of Appeal handed down   matter to the Supreme Court of      or the local municipality to
        judgement on the appeal       Appeal.                          regulate the conduct on the
        in the matter of the Mount                                     estate’s road network
        Edgecombe Country Club          In what is regarded as a
        Estate Management Association   landmark ruling the Supreme   The appeal succeeded and the
                                      Court of Appeal decided that
        II (RF) NPC v Singh & Others                                Supreme Court of Appeal set
        (323/2018) [2019] ZASCA 30 (28   on the evidence presented to it   aside the order of the Full Bench   PROPERTY TEAM
                                      that the estate’s internal roads
        March 2019).                                                and substituted it with an order
                                      are not public roads. The Court
          The matter concerned the    also went on to hold that the   dismissing the appeal to the Full
                                                                                                                                 Acquisition, sale and transfer
        lawfulness of certain of the   approach of the Full Bench could   Bench save for the declaration   he team’s experience   of commercial, industrial and
                                                                                                       and expertise covers not
        ‘road rules’ of the homeowners   not be supported even on the   of invalidity of certain domestic
        association which empower it to   assumption that the roads within   worker rules which was not   Tonly property transfers,   residential properties; leases,
                                                                                                  mortgages and bonds but
                                                                                                                                mortgages and servitudes;
        police the road network within the   the estate were regarded as public   appealed, and which still stands.   extends beyond this to town   retirement home schemes;
        residential estate, including the   roads. Supreme Court of Appeal   The judgement confirms   planning, appeals and rezoning   sectional title schemes;
        issuing of penalties for speeding.   Judge Visvanathan Ponnan in his   the right of homeowners   applications; Home Owners   sectional title arbitration;
                                      judgement held that:
          The relevant ‘road rules’                                 associations to regulate the   Association work and much more.  share block developments
        which two aggrieved residents/  “It cannot be said that     conduct of members through                                  and conversions to sectional
        members had sought to have    ordaining a lower speed       a system of rules and reaffirms   Over the last 50 years the   titles; time-sharing operations;
        declared unlawful were the    limit within the estate than   that the relationship between   Cox Yeats Property Team has   town planning, appeals and
        following:                    that prescribed by national   a homeowners association      gathered extensive experience   rezoning applications; township
                                      legislation goes beyond       and its members is founded in   partnering with a great number   development and subdivision
        7.1.2  The speed limit throughout    promoting, advancing and   contract. That having been said   of successful developers in both   of land; the impact of VAT on
              the Estate is 40 km/h. Any    protecting the interests of the…  homeowners associations must   large and small, commercial   property transactions; home
              person found driving    members or is unreasonable.   still ensure that their particular   and residential projects.  The   owners association/communal
              in excess of 40 km/h,    This is especially so given   rules are lawful and that they   Property Team consists of six   schemes establishment;
              will be subject to a penalty.    the presence of children,   satisfactorily regulate conduct   conveyancers and has over 130   operational issues; and
              The presence of children    pedestrians and animals   including, but not limited to,   years combined experience.    dispute resolution.
              and pedestrians as well as   (both domesticated and   conduct on their internal road   They are able to service clients
              many undomesticated     undomesticated) upon or in    networks.                     in all aspects relating to their   The team comprises Robin
              animals such as buck,    the immediate vicinity of the                              property.                     Westley (Partner and team
              monkeys, mongoose,      roads themselves. Rule 7.3.2   At the time of writing it still   Amongst the accolades’   leader), Tina Halstead (Partner),
              leguaans and wild birds    goes no further than to record   remains to be seen whether the   awarded to the members of the   Lazelle Paola (Partner), Carol
              means that drivers need to    that  the operating of vehicles in   decision will be taken on appeal   team is the Lawyer of the Year in   McDonald (Partner), Thabo
              exercise additional caution    contravention of the Act within   to the Constitutional Court. n  Real Estate in South Africa for   Vilakazi (Partner), Nicholas Cura
              when using the roads.   the estate is prohibited. I fail  to                        2018 awarded to senior attorney,   (Associate) and Roger Green
                                      see why that is prohibited.”                                Roger Green by the global     (Consultant). n
        7.3.2  Operating any vehicle in                             Lazelle Paola is a Partner at Cox Yeats
              contravention of the      In summary, the Supreme     Attorneys practicing in the Property   publication Best Lawyers.    For more information contact:
              National Road Traffic Act    Court of Appeal found that:  Services Law Team. Lazelle specialises in   Cox Yeats is also the recipient   T: 031 536 8500
              within Estate 2 is prohibited.                        property, commercial and notarial work,   of the Diamond Arrow PMR.  E:  rwestley@coxyeats.co.za;
                                      1.  In regulating the roads, the    conveyancing and local government                       thalstead@coxyeats.co.za;
          When the matter had first      homeowners association     law including town planning and   africa Award 2019 for the top-      lpaola@coxyeats.co.za;
                                                                                                  rated medium size law firm in
        come before the KwaZulu-         was not usurping the functions    litigation. From a commercial law and   South Africa.     cmcdonald@coxyeats.co.za;
                                                                    conveyancing perspective, Lazelle acts
        Natal High Court, Topping AJ,      reserved to the authorities    on behalf of several major financial                    tvilakazi@coxyeats.co.za;
        dismissed the application to      under the National Road    institutions, multinational companies,   The Property Team Services   ncura@coxyeats.co.za;
        set aside the rules. However, on      Traffic Act nor contravening    Home Owners Associations and Body   include:        rgreen@coxyeats.co.za
        appeal to a Full Bench of the      the provisions of that Act  Corporates and has been involved in                      W: www.coxyeats.co.za
        KwaZulu-Natal High Court the   2.  There is no conflict between    a wide range of high profile projects,
        judgement of Topping AJ was set      the rules and the National    as well as the establishment and
        aside and the aforementioned      Road Traffic Act          administration of various residential
                                                                    estates in KZN
        rules of the homeowners
        association, were declared    3.  The rules are contractually    Lazelle can be contacted on:
        invalid. The declaration of      binding on members and are    T: 031 536 8500
        invalidity of the road rules was      enforceable against them   or via email: lpaola@coxyeats.co.za





















        Robin Westley,        Tina Halstead,       Lazelle Paola,       Carol McDonald,      Thabo Vilikazi,      Nicholas Cura,       Roger Green,
        Partner, Team Leader   Partner             Partner              Partner              Partner              Associate            Consultant




       4
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9