Page 323 - The Toxicology of Fishes
P. 323

Reactive Oxygen Species and Oxidative Stress                                303


                       Nonenzymatic Antioxidant Defenses in Fish
                       The major nonenzymatic antioxidant defenses observed in mammals have also been studied in fish.
                       By far the most studied from a toxicological perspective is glutathione, which is present in fish tissues
                       at levels comparable to those observed in mammals (e.g., millimolar concentrations in liver tissue)
                       (Nimmo, 1987). As observed in mammals, tissue glutathione levels are often depleted after short-term
                       oxidant exposures but elevated after long-term exposures. Furthermore, glutathione depletion sensitizes
                       fish, like mammals, to the toxicity of prooxidant xenobiotics (Gallagher et al., 1992a). Other important
                       antioxidants, such as vitamin C, vitamin E, ubiquinone, and carotenoids, have been less studied relative
                       to toxicology in fish but likely play an important role (Bell et al., 2000; Olsen et al., 1999; Parihar
                       and Dubey, 1995; Payne et al., 1998; Tocher et al., 2002). In addition, important differences clearly
                       exist in terms of the ability of different fish species to synthesize vitamin C (Moreau-Regis and
                       Dabrowski, 1998). Although the majority of studies of nonenzymatic antioxidants in toxicology have
                       historically focused on glutathione, it is increasingly clear that other compounds are also important.
                       Studies of the total oxyradical scavenging capacity (TOSC) (Regoli and Winston, 1999; Winston et
                       al., 1998) of tissue homogenates from both aquatic and nonaquatic organisms have demonstrated that
                       compounds other than the classical antioxidants such as glutathione, vitamin C, and vitamin E can
                       contribute very significantly to the in vitro oxyradical scavenging capacity of those tissue preparations.
                       As in mammals, it is likely that diet plays a very important role in determining the nonenzymatic
                       antioxidant capacity of fish tissues (Mourente et al., 2000; Nakano et al., 1999; Olsen et al., 1999;
                       Pascual et al., 2003).

                       In Vivo Prooxidant Studies in Fish
                       As previously stated, the fact that a chemical produces ROS in an in vitro situation does not mean that
                       the same chemical will cause oxidative stress in vivo. The additional complications introduced by kinetics
                       of uptake, metabolism, and excretion in a living organism can be understood only by testing the effect
                       of a chemical in an in vivo system. Table 6.4 is a representative list of stressors shown to exert oxidative
                       stress either in intact fish or, in a few cases, in fish cells. It is important to bear in mind that not all
                       chemicals in the chemical classes listed in column 1 are expected to be prooxidants. Specific chemicals
                       that induced oxidative stress in the studies cited are listed in parentheses as examples. Generally speaking,
                       the chemicals shown to cause oxidative stress in mammals have also done so in fish.
                        Many chemicals are more or less toxic depending on other factors. An example that has received
                       considerable attention recently is phototoxicity, which is the greatly enhanced toxicity of specific
                       chemicals (especially many PAHs) in the presence of ultraviolet radiation. UV radiation can excite
                       an electron of such chemicals, and the resultant excited-state molecule is more reactive and often
                       ultimately more toxic. Empirical studies with fish have strongly supported the hypothesis that the
                       phototoxicity or photo-enhanced toxicity of PAHs resulting from the process of photosensitization
                       is mediated by oxidative stress (Choi and Oris, 2000; Weinstein et al., 1997). In addition, chemical
                       structure alterations produced by UV irradiation can produce compounds such as quinones and
                       phenols that are capable of redox cycling and interfering with electron flow in electron transport
                       chains of mitochondria (Huang et al., 1997; Tripuranthakam et al., 1999), both processes that can
                       lead to oxidative stress. Thus, phototoxicity represents a distinctive source of oxidative stress that
                       may be of particular importance in aquatic systems with clear water columns. It is important to note,
                       however, that most of the studies carried out thus far have been conducted under laboratory or
                       constrained field conditions, so the ecological relevance of phototoxicity is controversial (McDonald
                       and Chapman, 2002).

                       Differences between Fish and Mammals
                       As we have seen, many of the basic mechanisms of ROS production and damage are shared between
                       fish and mammals. Despite the overall similarities in antioxidant defenses, however, important differences
                       exist between fish and mammalian species, some of which are summarized here. ROS production in
                       microsomal fractions was higher in rainbow trout, as well as in two aquatic invertebrate species, with
   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328