Page 720 - The Toxicology of Fishes
P. 720

700                                                        The Toxicology of Fishes


                       Due to these capabilities, coupled with the ability of this method to distinguish germ and somatic cells
                       by DNA content and to identify apoptotic cells, the potential exists to develop protocols to identify
                       patterns of damage characteristic of specific inducing agents (Rempel et al., 2006; Roy et al., 2003;
                       Steinert et al., 1998; Tice, 1996).



                       Physiological Biomarkers

                       In addition to biochemical assays, the biomarker approach can be applied at a variety of levels of
                       biological organization (Handy et al., 2002a, 2003). Indeed, Peakall (1999) argued that the biomarker
                       concept should relate biological responses at the organism level and below. At the organism level, we
                       should therefore consider physiological and behavioral biomarkers. The notion that physiological or
                       behavioral responses could be used to assess pollutant exposure or effect is not new (Depledge, 1994;
                       Handy and Depledge, 1999); however, in the 1970s and 1980s the practical application of physiological
                       biomonitors was limited by technology that required considerable skill to set up and calibrate and could
                       only record from (at best) a few individual organisms at a time in a laboratory or field-laboratory situation
                       (Cairns and van der Schalie, 1980; Morgan and Kühn, 1984). Advances in electronic technology and
                       our understanding of the effects of pollutants on animal physiology and behavior have made physiological
                       biomarkers a practical proposition (Handy and Depledge, 1999); however, physiological biomarkers do
                       not necessarily have to use high technology, and many simple measurements can be made easily that
                       are informative of exposure or biological effect. Here, we briefly review physiological biomarkers roughly
                       in order of levels of biological organization, starting with measurements in the blood, then organ-level
                       measurements and indices, followed by body system effects (e.g., respiration), and finally integrated
                       whole-animal responses (behavior and animal physiology).


                       Hematology and Clinical Chemistry
                       Blood is the most accessible component of the vertebrate body fluid system and has frequently been
                       examined to assess physiological status (Houston, 1997). Many parameters can be measured, including
                       various blood cell counts, whole blood hemoglobin, plasma ion concentrations, and the activity of various
                       enzymes and hormones, as well as concentrations of pollutants in the blood. Questions then arise
                       regarding which blood parameters should be selected as a biomarker and what generic or specific
                       information about exposure or biological effect these blood biomarkers would give the toxicologist.

                       Blood Sampling Methods
                       Regardless of the blood parameter to be used as a biomarker, it is essential to (1) standardize blood sampling
                       protocols, and (2) appreciate that many normal biological variables will alter hematology or blood chem-
                       istry. This not only is good practice for laboratory work but also becomes essential if the biomarker is to
                       be used in monitoring programs or over long time scales to examine fish populations. Laboratory studies
                       have shown that blood chemistry is influenced by animal handling procedures (Waring et al., 1992) and
                       the use of anesthesia and anticoagulants (Iwama et al., 1989; Korcock et al., 1988), as well as the type
                       and duration of sample storage prior to chemical analysis (Jayaram and Beamish, 1992). Houston (1990)
                       discussed these general considerations for blood sample acquisition, and there is general agreement that
                       blood should be collected within about 5 minutes of initiating capture. Also, if a once-only terminal blood
                       sample is required, then  stunning is generally preferable to the use of  anesthesia.  When handling is
                       prolonged, however, or when other procedures are performed before blood collection (this is not recom-
                       mended), then anesthesia will reduce the impact of these stresses (Iwama et al., 1989). In the field situation,
                       stunning followed by the collection of caudal or cardiac blood into previously heparinized tubes that are
                       immediately placed in a cooler offers a good chance of collecting a representative blood sample. Every
                       attempt should be made to minimize the time required to capture the fish prior to blood sampling.
                        Reference values of blood parameters of fish are affected by many biological variables (Hille, 1992;
                       Rogers et al., 2003) that may not be directly related to pollutant exposure or the animal handling issues
                       noted above; for example, blood chemistry can change as the animal grows during chronic exposure
   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725