Page 830 - The Toxicology of Fishes
P. 830
810 The Toxicology of Fishes
Suspended Solids and Sediment
Although the toxicity of synthetic pyrethroids in clean water is extraordinary, the observations in field
trials have found that pyrethroids have not had as draconian an impact on fish populations as once feared.
Their toxicity is dramatically influenced by the presence of particulate matter in the water column,
probably through adsorption of the very lipophilic toxicant molecules to the suspended matter, sediment,
and possibly dissolved organic matter, as well (Coats et al., 1989; Smith and Stratton, 1986). Bioavail-
ability of the pyrethroid fenvalerate in water was shown to be drastically reduced in bioassays that
measured LC values for mosquito larvae in clean water and four different concentrations of humic acid
50
in the water. Up to a sixfold difference was observed in the 24-hour LC values, depending on the
50
concentration of humic acid added (Coats et al., 1989).
Toxicokinetics
Considerable research on the toxicokinetics of synthetic pyrethroids has been conducted in fish, in hopes
of finding explanations for the extreme susceptibility of fish to this class of insecticides compared to
birds and mammals and compared to other biodegradable insecticides (e.g., organophosphates and
carbamates):
• Are pyrethroids taken up more rapidly than other organic chemicals by the fish gills?
• Is there an especially effective distribution of pyrethroid residues to the nervous system in fish?
• Are fish deficient in their capability for detoxification of pyrethroids?
• Do fish excretory systems have poor efficiency of elimination of pyrethroids?
Uptake
The most definitive studies of uptake rates by fish gill have been conducted by Jim McKim at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) lab in Duluth, MN. Working with him, Bradbury and Coats
(1989a) studied the uptake efficiency of H-fenvalerate in rainbow trout in a passive diffusion model for
3
xenobiotic uptake and distribution (McKim and Heath, 1983). The average uptake efficiency was 28.6%,
which was much lower than the majority of other organic chemicals studied in that system. The calculated
logP of 7.2 for fenvalerate was similar to that calculated for mirex (logP of 7.5); the gill uptake efficiency
for the rainbow trout was also low for mirex (20%). The implication is that mirex and fenvalerate are
so lipophilic that they are not rapidly absorbed across the fish gill (Bradbury et al., 1986), and they are
both taken up more slowly than the numerous other classes of chemicals tested (McKim et al., 1985)
which were less lipophilic. It is possible that an optimum lipophilicity exists for rapid uptake by fish
rather than the oft-assumed positive correlation between lipophilicity and uptake rates in fish.
Distribution
The radiolabeled fenvalerate also allowed for study of the distribution of residues within the rainbow
trout body. The largest proportion of residues were found in the bile, with the fat deposits next, followed
by the liver, gill, kidney, and red blood cells. All of those locations are to be expected for a lipophilic
xenobiotic, and the concentration in the brain (21 parts per trillion) was lower than most other tissue
levels. The distribution does not seem to especially favor selective partitioning or delivery to the brain
(Bradbury et al., 1986).
Detoxification
The biotransformation of several synthetic pyrethroids has been examined; those studied have included
fenvalerate, permethrin, and cypermethrin. Identification of the most prevalent metabolites revealed that
oxidation products were common, primarily due to ring hydroxylation and side-chain oxidation reactions