Page 56 - The Welfare of Cattle
P. 56

MICrobIaL PathoGens                                                          33


            table 5.2  Pathogen Prevalence and Loads in Fresh animal Manure
                                        Pathogen Prevalence and Load in animal Manure
            animal type/  Escherichia                               Giardia   Cryptosporidium
            Description    coli O157   Salmonella  Campylobacter  intestinalis    parvum
                                                 Cattle
            Prevalence (%)   13.2         7.7          12.8          3.6           5.4
            Load (Cfu/g)    2.9 × 10 6  3.9 × 10 4    7.6 × 10 3    2.2 × 10 2    2.7 × 10 2
                                                  Pig
            Prevalence (%)   11.9         7.9          13.5          2.4           13.5
            Load (Cfu/g)    6.9 × 10 4  9.6 × 10 3    1.9 × 10 3    5.3 × 10 4    3.0 × 10 2
                                                 Poultry
            Prevalence (%)    0           17.9         19.4           0             0
            Load (Cfu/g)      0         5.0 × 10 3    4.2 × 10 3      0             0

                                                 Sheep
            Prevalence (%)   20.8         8.3          20.8          20.8          29.2
            Load (Cfu/g)    1.1 × 10 4  1.1 × 10 3    8.6 × 10 2    3.8 × 10 2    5.3 × 10 1
            Data source:  hutchison et al. (2004). note: number of manure samples for cattle, pig, poultry, and sheep were
                      810, 126, 67, and 24, respectively. Cfu/g is the number of colony-forming units/gram of manure.
            Note:  different pathogens have different effective doses required to cause disease. some need a high dose of
                 Cfu, some a small dose.



                                       PathOGeN PreVaLeNCe

               A pathogen’s prevalence (how often they are found) and load (how many are found in the manure
            tested) in fresh manure of cattle, pig, poultry, and sheep shown in Table 5.2. Untreated manure does
            represent a potential risk to animal and human health (Atwill et al., 2006; Atwill et al., 2012; Pandey
            et al., 2014), and minimizing or eliminating their impact on the environment is an important goal.



                                       PathOGeN traNSPOrt

               Microbes do not have the ability to travel any significant distance on their own, and must rely
            on hitching a ride on or in something that is moving such as water, dust, boots, tires, other animals,
            etc. The leading method of transporting pathogenic microorganisms from manure is in ambient
            water that is runoff from agricultural land (agricultural nonpoint source (NPS) pollution) (Atwill
            et al., 2002; EPA, 2013; EPA, 2017a; EPA, 2017b). Both intensive and extensive animal production
            systems that inadequately manage their manure, including that used as fertilizer on crop lands, often
            result in an increase of microbial pathogens in ambient water (Chapin et al., 2005; Hollenbeck,
            2016; Rogers and Haines, 2005).
               The pathogen type and load originating from animal manure and found in cropland and soil
            depends on various factors such as amount of sunlight, temperature, moisture, rainfall, pH,  presence
            or absence of specific soil nutrients, and the source, timing, and amount of manure applied.
            Unintended runoff associated with rainfall is a major cause of contamination. The major factors
            that control pathogen levels in a natural environment are time and higher temperatures and radiation
            of sunlight (Baumgardner, 2012; Hipsey et al., 2008).
               In North America and the European Union, there are major efforts ongoing to minimize or
              eliminate the transport of manure pathogens from confined feeding operation to natural water
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61