Page 1329 - Small Animal Internal Medicine, 6th Edition
P. 1329

CHAPTER 79   Lymphoma   1301


            patient is used in an attempt to determine the extent of   gists. This can be done by immunocytochemistry, immu-
            disease and correlate it with the prognosis. Unfortunately, it   nohistochemistry,  FCM,  or  PARR.  But  the  main  question
  VetBooks.ir  has little prognostic value (i.e., animals with stage I disease   is: Should every dog or cat with lymphoma be immuno-
                                                                 phenotyped before initiating therapy? The blanket answer
            have survival times similar to those of animals with stage IV
            disease). The only prognostic information of clinical rele-
                                                                 mainly in dogs with multicentric lymphoma; however, in our
            vance in this system is the fact that asymptomatic (i.e., sub-  is “no.” Phenotype has been shown to change the prognosis,
            stage a) dogs with lymphoma have a better prognosis than   experience, it rarely changes the initial treatment approach.
            “sick” (i.e., substage b) dogs. As discussed earlier, with the   In dogs, a T-cell phenotype is quite likely if the patient is
            novel FCM analyzer’s use for in-house CBCs, circulating   a Boxer,  has hypercalcemia or a  mediastinal  mass, or has
            neoplastic cells are frequently identified in the graphics;   cutaneous involvement.
            therefore these patients who would have previously been   Although multiple previously published reports suggest
            classified as stage III, now undergo “stage migration” to stage   that dogs with large-cell T-cell lymphoma treated with stan-
            V disease.                                           dard combination chemotherapy have a worse prognosis for
              A staging system that takes into account tumor bulk and   remission and survival than dogs with B-cell tumors; in one
            FeLV status in cats with lymphoma provides some prognos-  of the author’s experience (GC), this is not the case. In a
            tic information. Until a new system is devised, it is advisable   previous study, T-cell phenotype was not a negative prognos-
            to determine the prognosis on the basis of the patient’s   tic factor in dogs with lymphoma treated with COP- or
            overall clinical condition, the FeLV status (in cats), and any   CHOP-based protocols (Hosoya et al., 2007). This is likely
            constitutional signs or severe hematologic and biochemical   because most dogs with T-cell lymphoma received lomustine
            abnormalities the patient may have. Another important issue   (CCNU), a drug that may be more effective in patients with
            is that, even though a specific staging protocol may be of   T-cell phenotype.
            some prognostic value in patients treated with a given che-
            motherapy protocol, it may not be so when a different drug   Treatment
            combination is used. Moreover, at this time the effectiveness   Once a diagnosis of lymphoma is established, the prognosis
            of more aggressive protocols in dogs and cats with advanced-  and potential therapeutic options should be discussed with
            stage lymphoma is unknown.                           the pet’s family. Remission rates in cats and dogs with lym-
              At least a CBC, a serum biochemistry profile, and a uri-  phoma treated with various chemotherapy protocols are
            nalysis should be performed in all cats and dogs with lym-  approximately 65% to 75% and 80% to 90%, respectively.
            phoma whose owners are contemplating therapy. In addition,   Most cats with multicentric or mediastinal lymphoma treated
            FeLV and FIV tests should be performed in cats. The result-  with multiple-agent chemotherapy protocols are expected to
            ing minimum database can provide a wealth of information   live 6 to 9 months; approximately 20% to 30% of the cats live
            that can help the owner (and clinician) decide whether the   more than 1 year. Cats with small cell intestinal lymphoma
            patient should be treated. In addition, once a decision to   typically live in excess of 2 years, with response rates of
            treat the pet has been made, the nature of any clinicopatho-  >90%. Most dogs with lymphoma treated with multiagent
            logic abnormalities usually dictates the treatment or treat-  chemotherapy are expected to live 8 to 16 months; approxi-
            ments  used. For  example, in  a  dog  with  pronounced   mately 20% to 30% of the dogs are alive 2 years after diag-
            cytopenias caused by lymphomatous infiltration of the bone   nosis. The approximate survival time in untreated cats and
            marrow, a highly myelosuppressive chemotherapy combina-  dogs with lymphoma is 4 to 8 weeks. The reasons for the
            tion will almost certainly result in severe neutropenia and   shorter survival times in cats as compared with dogs with
            sepsis; it should therefore be avoided. L-asparaginase is a   lymphoma is that their initial response rates (especially, the
            useful initial treatment in this situation, as it does not have   complete response rates) are lower, and along with this,
            myelosuppressive effects.                            remissions appear to be difficult to reinduce once their
              In cats and dogs with suspected CNS lymphoma, it is   disease has relapsed. In addition, the retrovirus-associated
            advisable to perform cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and   nonlymphomatous disorders that affect cats with lymphoma
            advanced imaging (i.e., computed tomography [CT] scan or   lead to shortened survival times (i.e., FeLV infection is a
            magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). The finding of high   negative prognostic factor in cats with lymphoma).
            numbers of neoplastic lymphoid cells and an increased   In our experience, even if a patient has stage I nodal or
            protein concentration in a CSF sample is diagnostic for lym-  extranodal lymphoma at the time of presentation, systemic
            phoma. Because of their poor accessibility, the diagnosis of   dissemination of the disease usually occurs within weeks
            extradural masses usually requires the collection of a surgical   to months of diagnosis. However, occasionally solitary oral
            specimen for cytologic or histopathologic evaluation. As dis-  or cutaneous lymphomas may behave as true stage I dis-
            cussed earlier, the authors’ clinics assume that any dog or cat   eases (i.e., there is no systemic dissemination). Therefore
            with lymphoma and central neurologic signs has CNS   the mainstay of treatment for patients with lymphoma is
            involvement until proven otherwise, and it is treated appro-  chemotherapy, given the fact that lymphomas are (or will
            priately (see later).                                become) systemic neoplasms. Surgery, radiotherapy, or both
              As previously discussed, immunophenotyping of canine   can be used to treat localized lymphomas before or during
            and feline lymphoma has become routine for most oncolo-  chemotherapy.  Half-body  irradiation  and  bone  marrow
   1324   1325   1326   1327   1328   1329   1330   1331   1332   1333   1334