Page 1505 - Small Animal Internal Medicine, 6th Edition
P. 1505

CHAPTER 95   Polysystemic Rickettsial Diseases   1477


            can occur. Thus whether to treat seropositive healthy dogs   Doxycycline given at 100 mg/dog/day was used successfully
            is controversial. Arguments for and against testing or treat-  as a chemopreventative (Davoust et al., 2005). Dogs used for
  VetBooks.ir  ing healthy dogs were reviewed by the ACVIM Infectious   blood donors should be screened for E. canis infections by
                                                                 serology and PCR assay; the ACVIM optimally recommends
            Disease Study Group (Neer et al., 2002). The primary
            reason to treat a seropositive healthy dog is to try to elimi-
                                                                 et al., 2016). However, if PCR assay cannot be performed,
            nate infection before development of chronic-phase disease.   using  only  dogs  that  are  negative  in  both  tests  (Wardrop
            However, treatment of healthy dogs is controversial for at   the minimal standard recommended was to use only sero-
            least six reasons: (1) whether treatment halts progression to   negative dogs as donors.
            the chronic phase is unknown; (2) not all seropositive dogs   Some countries have published guidelines to be used by
            are infected; (3) not all seropositive dogs progress to the   veterinarians to aid in the management of ehrlichiosis and
            chronic phase; (4) whether treatment eliminates infection   anaplasmosis (Neer et al., 2002; Sainz et al., 2015).
            is unknown; (5) even if infection is eliminated, reinfection
            can occur; and (6) treatment of healthy carriers may result
            in antimicrobial resistance. Because further data are neces-  FELINE MONOCYTOTROPIC
            sary to make definitive recommendations, owners should   EHRLICHIOSIS
            be given the pros and cons and asked to make treatment
            decisions.                                           Etiology and Epidemiology
              The prognosis is good for dogs with acute ehrlichiosis,   Ehrlichia-like bodies or morulae have been detected in
            and it is variable to guarded for those with chronic ehrlichio-  peripheral lymphocytes or monocytes of naturally exposed
            sis. Fever, petechiae, vomiting, diarrhea, epistaxis, and   cats in a number of countries, including the United States,
            thrombocytopenia often resolve within days after initiation   Kenya, France, Brazil, and Thailand. DNA consistent with E.
            of  therapy  in  acute  cases.  Bone  marrow  suppression  from   canis has been amplified from blood of naturally infected
            chronic-phase ehrlichiosis  may not respond for weeks to   cats  in multiple  surveys (Aguirre et al., 2004;  Braga et al.,
            months, if at all. Anabolic steroids and other bone marrow   2013; Braga et al., 2012; Breitschwerdt et al., 2002; de Oliveira
            stimulants can be administered but are unlikely to be effec-  et al., 2009; Hegarty et al., 2015). In Brazil, cats at high risk
            tive because precursor cells are often lacking. Immune-  for R. sanguineus infestation had a PCR-positive rate for E.
            mediated events resulting in the destruction of red blood   canis  DNA of  9.4%  (Braga  et al.,  2014).  In addition,  E.
            cells or platelets are likely to occur with ehrlichiosis, leading   chaffeensis DNA has been amplified from the blood of natu-
            to the recommendation to administer antiinflammatory or   rally exposed cats in the United States (Hegarty et al., 2015).
            immunosuppressive doses of glucocorticoids to acutely   In Europe,  Ehrlichia canis DNA has been amplified from
            affected animals. Prednisone (2.2 mg/kg PO divided q12h   ticks collected from some cats (Pennisi et al., 2015). In the
            during the first 3 to 4 days after diagnosis) may be beneficial   United States, Amblyomma americanum removed from cats
            in some cases, but controlled data are lacking.      were shown to occasionally contain DNA of E. chaffeensis
                                                                 (Little et al., 2018). Cats have also been shown to have anti-
            Zoonotic Aspects and Prevention                      bodies that react to specific peptides of  E. canis and  E.
            Dogs and human beings are both infected by E. canis and E.   chaffeensis (Hegarty et al., 2015). These studies document
            chaffeensis. Although people cannot acquire ehrlichiosis   that cats can be exposed to mononuclear Ehrlichia spp. and
            from handling an infected dog, dogs may be reservoirs for   become infected. However, other studies of cats in endemic
            these agents and may play a role in the human disease by   areas (Arizona, Florida, Louisiana) have failed to amplify
            bringing vectors into the human environment. Ticks should   Ehrlichia spp. DNA from the blood of cats (Eberhardt et al.,
            be removed and handled with care. Tick control should be   2006; Levy et al., 2011; Luria et al., 2004;). In one study of
            maintained at all times; administration of fipronil was shown   naturally exposed cats, E. canis DNA was amplified from the
            to lessen transmission in one study (Davoust et al., 2003). In   blood, but antibodies were never detected (Breitschwerdt
            another study, administration of imidacloprid 10% and per-  et al., 2002). Pathogenesis of disease associated with mono-
            methrin 50% to young dogs lessened prevalence of E. canis   cytotropic ehrlichiosis in cats is unknown but is likely to be
            infections by 94.6% (Otranto et al., 2010). Because E. canis   similar to that for E. canis infection of dogs. Guidelines for
            is not passed transovarially in the tick, it can be eliminated   cats with  Ehrlichia spp. infections have been published in
            in the environment by tick control or by treating all dogs   Europe (Pennisi et al., 2017).
            through a generation of ticks. Ehrlichia canis can be trans-
            mitted within 3 hours of tick attachment so use of products   Clinical Features
            that repel or very quickly kill the ticks may be superior to   All ages of cats have been infected; most cats were domestic
            products with a slower kill rate (Jongejan et al., 2016). Rhipi-  short-haired, and both males and females have been affected.
            cephalus  can  only  transmit  E. canis  for  approximately  155   Anorexia, fever, inappetence, lethargy, weight loss, hyperes-
            days; if tick control is not feasible tetracycline can be admin-  thesia or joint pain, pale mucous membranes, splenomegaly,
            istered (6.6 mg/kg PO daily for 200 days). During this time,   dyspnea, and lymphadenopathy were the most common
            infected dogs will not infect new ticks, and previously   historic and physical examination abnormalities. Dyspnea,
            infected ticks will lose the ability to transmit the organism.   petechiae, retinal detachments, vitreous hemorrhages, and
   1500   1501   1502   1503   1504   1505   1506   1507   1508   1509   1510