Page 33 - Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values 3rd Edition
P. 33

where w is the vector of economic weights and all other terms are as defined in Eqn 1.17.
        The equations to be solved to get the weights (b values) to be used in the index are:
            bp 11 +  b p 12 +   + b p m1 =  w g 11 +  w g 12 +    w g m1
                                    1
                                           2
                                                    m
                   2
             1
                             m
            bp +  b p 22 +   + b p m = wwg +  w g 22 +   +  w g
                             m 2
                                                      mm1
                                            2
                                     121
             121
                   2

                1 +   2 +   + b p mm =  1 +     2 +   +  g
            bp m1  b p m2     m     w g m1  w g m2    w mmmm
        In matrix notation these equations are:
            Pb = Gw
                 −1
            b = P Gw
            It should be noted that it is possible there are some traits in the index that are not
        in the aggregate breeding value but may be correlated with other traits in H. Conversely,
        some traits in the aggregate breeding value may be difficult to measure or occur late in
        life and may therefore not be in the index. Such traits may be replaced in the index with
        other highly correlated traits that are easily measurable or occur early in life. Con-
        sequently, the vector of economic weights may not necessarily be of the same dimension
        as traits in the index, as indicated in the equations for b above. Each trait in the index
        is weighted by the economic weight relevant to the breeding value of the trait it is pre-
        dicting in the aggregate breeding value.
            The index calculated using Eqn 1.22 implies that the same economic weights are
        applied to the traits in the aggregate genotype across the whole population. A change
        in the economic weight for one of the traits would imply recalculating the index. An
        alternative formulation of Eqn 1.22 involves calculating a sub-index for each trait in
        H without the economic weights. The final index in Eqn 1.23 is obtained by summing
        the sub-indices for each trait weighted by their respective economic weights. Thus:
               m
            I =  S w i                                                      (1.23)
                 I i
               i=1
                   −1
        where I  = P G (y − m), the sub-index for trait i in H and w  = economic weight for
               i      i                                      i
        trait i.
            With Eqn 1.23, a change in the economic weights of any of the traits in the index
        can easily be implemented without recalculating the index.
            To demonstrate that Eqns 1.22 and 1.23 are equivalent, assume that there are
        two traits in H, then Eqn 1.23 becomes:

            I = I w  + I w
                1  1  2  2
                −1
                               −1
             = P G w (y − m) + P G w (y − m)
                   1  1           2  2
        where G  is the covariance matrix between trait i and all traits in the index. Thus:
                i
                −1
            I = P (G w  + G w )(y − m)
                    1  1   2  2
                −1
             = P Gw(y − m)
        which is the same as Eqn 1.22.
        Example 1.9
        Assume the economic weights for ADG and LP are £1.5 and £0.5 per an increase of
        1 kg in ADG and 1% increase in LP, respectively. Using the genetic parameters


        Genetic Evaluation with Different Sources of Records                  17
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38