Page 134 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 134

PART II    Diagnostic Procedures for the Cancer Patient




  VetBooks.ir  6





           Diagnostic Imaging in Oncology




           STEPHANIE NYKAMP AND ELISSA RANDALL






           Diagnostic imaging is essential in the diagnosis, clinical staging,   the sensitivity of radiographs is lower than that of CT for the
           and evaluation of response to therapy of cancer patients. Radiog-  detection of pulmonary metastasis, they will likely continue to
           raphy, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic reso-  remain the initial screening test because of the low cost and high
           nance  imaging  (MRI), positron  emission  tomography  (PET),   availability (Fig. 6.1). 6–8
           and nuclear scintigraphy can all be used to evaluate the cancer   Radiography is also the primary method for the diagnosis and
           patient. Advanced functional imaging (e.g., PET/CT, PET/  monitoring of dogs and cats with tumors of the appendicular
                                                                                9
           MR) may also prove valuable in predicting response to therapy.   skeleton (Fig. 6.2).  Detection of an aggressive bone lesion on
           The choice of modality is dependent on availability and desired   radiographs is not definitive for neoplasia, but signalment, his-
           outcome, with each modality having advantages and disadvan-  tory, clinical signs, and travel history can help differentiate neo-
                                                                                        9
           tages in regard to cost, sensitivity, and specificity. When evalu-  plasia from infectious causes.  Although radiographs remain the
           ating the primary tumor, accurate detection of tumor margins   primary diagnostic tool for appendicular bone tumors, CT and
           is paramount. When evaluating for metastasis, the ideal modal-  MRI are more accurate for determining tumor margins, which
           ity would be both highly sensitive and specific so that all lesions   is necessary to optimize outcomes when using advanced treat-
           are detected accurately. If such a modality is not available, initial   ment techniques such as limb-sparing  surgery or stereotactic
           imaging should be done with a modality that is highly sensitive   radiosurgery. 10
           and followed with one that is more specific.             Limitations of radiography include superimposition of over-
                                                                                                                  8
             The use of advanced imaging and improved techniques for   lying structures and the relatively limited contrast resolution.
           functional imaging are improving the accuracy and precision of   Radiology software exists that can suppress overlying bony
           cancer imaging.  It should be noted that this can also result in   structures using advanced processing and pattern recognition
                       1
           stage migration. The effect of this additional information is not   algorithms,  which  significantly  increase  sensitivity  for detec-
                                                                                 11
           fully understood for many and should be used with caution when   tion of lung nodules ; however, they are of limited availability
                          2
           predicting outcome.  This chapter outlines the principles of each   in veterinary medicine, and other imaging modalities have been
           modality and their utility in assessing the veterinary cancer patient.  used to overcome this limitation. When the preferred imaging
                                                                 modality is not immediately available, radiographs can be useful
           Imaging Modalities                                    in detecting masses in other body regions (e.g., abdomen) as well.
                                                                 Radiographs may provide evidence that a mass is present such
           Radiography                                           that abdominal ultrasound, CT, or MRI can then be performed
                                                                 to detect the origin of the mass. 
           Conventional radiography has historically been the primary
           modality for assessment of cancer patients because it is readily   Ultrasonography
           available at a low cost, but it is gradually being replaced with
           other modalities that are more sensitive, specific, and becoming   Ultrasound is widely available and relatively inexpensive, result-
           more readily available.                               ing in widespread usage as a first-line diagnostic modality for a
             With  few  exceptions,  radiography  is a  screening  test  rather   variety of diseases, including cancer diagnosis and staging and
           than providing a definitive diagnosis. The most common appli-  for restaging or evaluating response to treatment. The ability to
           cation for radiographs is screening for pulmonary metastasis. In   evaluate the internal structure of organs and to better evaluate
           dogs and cats, thoracic radiographs are obtained with the patient   body cavities in the presence of effusion has resulted in ultra-
           in a recumbent position, and this results in atelectasis of the   sound replacing survey and contrast radiographs as the primary
           dependent lung. Three views (left and right lateral and dorso-  method of abdominal imaging.
           ventral or ventrodorsal) are recommended because this position-  Ultrasound is very good for identifying and localizing lesions,
           dependent atelectasis can reduce lesion conspicuity. The diagnosis   but the sonographic appearance may not be specific to the nature
           would change in 12% to 15% of patients when only two views   of the lesion. 12–21  The lack of specificity is more apparent when
           are obtained, with left lateral and ventrodorsal views being less   assessing multicentric diseases, such as lymphoma and mast cell
           sensitive than right lateral and ventrodorsal views. 3–5  Although   tumor, where the sonographic appearances are variable and a


                                                                                                              113113
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139