Page 647 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 647

CHAPTER 28  Tumors of the Mammary Gland  625


             200.   Perez-Alenza MD, Jimenez A, Nieto AI, et al.: First description of     214.   Kamstock DA, Fredrickson R, Ehrhart EJ: Lipid-rich carcinoma of
               feline inflammatory mammary carcinoma: clinicopathological and   the mammary gland in a cat, Vet Pathol 42:360–362, 2005.
               immunohistochemical characteristics of three cases, Breast Cancer     215.   Matsuda K, Kobayashi S, Yamashita M, et al.: Tubulopapillary car-
  VetBooks.ir    201.   McNeill CJ, Sorenmo KU, Shofer FS, et al.: Evaluation of adjuvant   cinoma with spindle cell metaplasia of the mammary gland in a cat,
               Res 6:R300–307, 2004.
                                                                     J Vet Med Sci 70:479–481, 2008.
               doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for the treatment of feline mam-
               mary carcinoma, J Vet Intern Med 23:123–129, 2009.    216.   Zappulli V, Caliari D, Rasotto R, et al.: Proposed classification of
                                                                     the feline “complex” mammary tumors as ductal and intraductal
             202.   Goldschmidt MH, Pena L, Zappulli V: Tumors of the mammary   papillary mammary tumors, Vet Pathol 50:1070–1077, 2013.
               gland.  In Meuten DJ, editor:  Tumors  in domestic animals, ed 5,     217.   Seixas F, Palmeira C, Pires MA, et al.: Grade is an independent
               Oxford, UK, 2017, John Wiley and Sons.                prognostic factor for feline mammary carcinomas: a clinicopatho-
             203.   Soares M, Madeira S, Correia J, et al.: Molecular based subtyping   logical and survival analysis, Vet J 187:65–71, 2011.
               of feline mammary carcinomas and clinicopathological character-    218.   Mills SW, Musil KM, Davies JL, et al.: Prognostic value of histo-
               ization, Breast 27:44–51, 2016.                       logic grading for feline mammary carcinoma: a retrospective sur-
             204.   Soares M, Correia J, Peleteiro MC, et al.: St Gallen molecular sub-  vival analysis, Vet Pathol 52:238–249, 2015.
               types in feline mammary carcinoma and paired metastases-disease     219.   MacEwen EG, Hayes AA, Harvey HJ, et al.: Prognostic factors for
               progression and clinical implications from a 3-year follow-up study,   feline mammary tumors, J Am Vet Med Assoc 185:201–204, 1984.
               Tumour Biol 37:4053–4064, 2016.                     220.   MacEwen EG, Hayes AA, Mooney S, et al.: Evaluation of effect of
             205.   Caliari D, Zappulli V, Rasotto R, et al.: Triple-negative vimentin-  levamisole on feline mammary cancer, J Biol Response Mod 3:541–
               positive heterogeneous feline mammary carcinomas as a potential   546, 1984.
               comparative model for breast cancer, BMC Vet Res 10(185), 2014.    221.   Viste JR, Myers SL, Singh B, et al.: Feline mammary adenocarci-
             206.   Beha G, Muscatello LV, Brunetti B, et al.: Molecular phenotype of   noma: tumor size as a prognostic indicator, Can Vet J 43:33–37,
               primary mammary tumours and distant metastases in female dogs   2002.
               and cats, J Comp Pathol 150:194–197, 2014.          222.   Gemignani F, Mayhew PD, Giuffrida MA, et al.: Association of
             207.   Wiese DA, Thaiwong T, Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan V, et al.: Feline mam-  surgical approach with complication rate, progression-free sur-
               mary basal-like adenocarcinomas: a potential model for human tri-  vival time, and disease-specific survival time in cats with mam-
               ple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with basal-like subtype, BMC   mary adenocarcinoma: 107 cases (1991–2014), J Am Vet Med Assoc
               Cancer 13:403, 2013.                                  252:1393–1402, 2018.
             208.   Brunetti  B, Asproni P, Beha G, et  al.: Molecular phenotype in     223.   Borrego JF, Cartagena JC, Engel J: Treatment of feline mammary
               mammary tumours of queens: correlation between primary tumour   tumours using chemotherapy, surgery and a COX-2 inhibitor drug
               and lymph node metastasis, J Comp Pathol 148:206–213, 2013.  (meloxicam): a retrospective study of 23 cases (2002–2007), Vet
             209.   Hayden  DW, Barnes DM, Johnson KH: Morphologic changes   Comp Oncol 7:213–221, 2009.
               in the mammary gland of megestrol acetate-treated and untreated     224.   Jeglum KA, deGuzman E, Young KM: Chemotherapy of advanced
               cats: a retrospective study, Vet Pathol 26:104–113, 1989.  mammary adenocarcinoma in 14 cats, J Am Vet Med Assoc 187:157–
             210.   Castagnaro M, Casalone C, Bozzetta E, et al.: Tumour grading and   160, 1985.
               the one-year post-surgical prognosis in feline mammary carcino-    225.   Mauldin GN, Matus RE, Patnaik AK, et al.: Efficacy and toxic-
               mas, J Comp Pathol 119:263–275, 1998.                 ity of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide used in the treatment
             211.   Seixas F, Palmeira C, Pires MA, et al.: Mammary invasive micro-  of selected malignant tumors in 23 cats, J Vet Intern Med 2:60–65,
               papillary carcinoma in cats: clinicopathologic features and nuclear   1988.
               DNA content, Vet Pathol 44:842–848, 2007.           226.   Karayannopoulou M, Kaldrymidou E, Constantinidis TC, et al.:
             212.   Seixas F, Pires MA, Lopes CA: Complex carcinomas of the mam-  Adjuvant post-operative chemotherapy in bitches with mammary
               mary gland in cats: pathological and immunohistochemical fea-  cancer, J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 48:85–96, 2001.
               tures, Vet J 176:210–215, 2008.                     227.   Hahn K, Richardson R, Knapp D: Canine malignant mammary
             213.   Sarli G, Brunetti B, Benazzi C: Mammary mucinous carcinoma in   neoplasia: biological behavior, diagnosis, and treatment alterna-
               the cat, Vet Pathol 43:667–673, 2006.                 tives, J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 28:251–256, 1992.
   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652