Page 642 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 642

620   PART IV    Specific Malignancies in the Small Animal Patient



          TABLE 28.8     Prognostic Factors and Indications for Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Level of Supporting Evidence in
                      Cats with Malignant Mammary Tumors
  VetBooks.ir  Tumor Size     Lymph Node Involvement  Histopathologic   Indication for       Evidence Level a
                                                                        Chemotherapy No or Yes
                                                   Parameters
            <2 cm /8 cm 3     Negative             Carcinoma            No                   1 220
                                                                        Yes b                3 210,217,221
            2–3 cm/8–27 cm 3  Negative             Carcinoma            No                   3 219,222
                                                                        Yes b                3 210,217,221
            >3 cm/ 27 cm 3    Negative             Carcinoma            Yes                  1, 220 2, 199  3 219,222
            Any               Positive             Carcinoma            Yes                  2, 199 3, 217  5 80

            a Evidence level 1: Prospective randomized trial; level 2: Prospective, nonrandomized trial; level 3: Retrospective; level 5: Extrapolation from human breast cancer studies.
            b Vascular invasion and high grade were found to be independent negative prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.




         References                                             16.   Goldschmidt M, Shofer FS, Smelstoys JA: Neoplastic lesions of the
                                                                    mammary gland. In Mohr U, Carlton WW, Dungworth DL, et al.:
           1.   Dorn CR, Taylor DO, Schneider R, et al.: Survey of animal neo-  Pathobiology of the aging dog. Ames, Iowa State University Press,
              plasms in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California. II.   2001, pp 168–178.
              Cancer morbidity in dogs and cats from Alameda County, J Natl    17.   Rivera  P, Melin M,  Biagi T, et  al.: Mammary tumor  develop-
              Cancer Inst 40:307–318, 1968.                         ment in dogs is associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2, Cancer Res
           2.   Moe L: Population-based incidence of mammary tumours in some   69:8770–8774, 2009.
              dog breeds, J Reprod Fertil Suppl 57:439–443, 2001.   18.   Schneider  R, Dorn CR, Taylor  DO: Factors influencing canine
           3.   Egenvall A, Bonnett BN, Ohagen P, et al.: Incidence of and sur-  mammary cancer development and postsurgical survival,  J Natl
              vival after mammary tumors in a population of over 80,000 insured   Cancer Inst 43:1249–1261, 1969.
              female dogs in sweden from 1995 to 2002, Prev Vet Med 69:109–   19.   Sonnenschein EG, Glickman LT, Goldschmidt MH, et al.: Body
              127, 2005.                                            conformation, diet, and risk of breast cancer in pet dogs: a case-
           4.   Dobson JM, Samuel S, Milstein H, et al.: Canine neoplasia in the   control study, Am J Epidemiol 133:694–703, 1991.
              UK: estimates of incidence rates from a population of insured dogs,    20.   Misdorp W: Canine mammary tumours: protective effect of late
              J Small Anim Pract 43:240–246, 2002.                  ovariectomy and stimulating effect of progestins, Vet Q 10:26–33,
           5.   Bronden LB, Nielsen SS, Toft N, et al.: Data from the danish vet-  1988.
              erinary cancer registry on the occurrence and distribution of neo-   21.   Kristiansen VM, Nodtvedt A, Breen AM, et al.: Effect of ovariohys-
              plasms in dogs in Denmark, Vet Rec 166:586–590, 2010.  terectomy at the time of tumor removal in dogs with benign mam-
           6.   Merlo DF, Rossi L, Pellegrino C, et al.: Cancer incidence in pet   mary  tumors and  hyperplastic  lesions:  a randomized  controlled
              dogs: findings of the animal tumor registry of genoa, Italy, J Vet   clinical trial, J Vet Intern Med 27:935–942, 2013.
              Intern Med 22:976–984, 2008.                      22.   Brodey RS, Fidler IJ, Howson AE: The relationship of estrous irreg-
           7.   Vascellari M, Capello K, Carminato A, et al.: Incidence of mam-  ularity, pseudopregnancy, and pregnancy to the development of
              mary tumors in the canine population living in the veneto region   canine mammary neoplasms, J Am Vet Med Assoc 149:1047–1049,
              (northeastern Italy): risk factors and similarities to human breast   1966.
              cancer, Prev Vet Med 126:183–189, 2016.           23.   Stovring  M, Moe L, Glattre E: A population-based case-control
           8.   Salas  Y, Marquez A, Diaz D, et  al: Epidemiological study of   study of canine mammary tumours and clinical use of medroxy-
              mammary tumors in female dogs diagnosed during the period   progesterone acetate, APMIS 105:590–596, 1997.
              2002–2012: a growing animal health problem,  PLoS One    24.   Concannon PW, Spraker TR, Casey HW, et al.: Gross and histo-
              10:e0127381.                                          pathologic effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate and progester-
           9.   Benjamin SA, Lee AC, Saunders WJ: Classification and behavior of   one on the mammary glands of adult beagle bitches, Fertil Steril
              canine mammary epithelial neoplasms based on life-span observa-  36:373–387, 1981.
              tions in beagles, Vet Pathol 36:423–436, 1999.    25.   Giles RC, Kwapien RP, Geil RG, et al.: Mammary nodules in bea-
          10.   Schneider R: Comparison of age, sex, and incidence rates in human   gle dogs administered investigational oral contraceptive steroids,
              and canine breast cancer, Cancer 26:419–426, 1970.    J Natl Cancer Inst 60:1351–1364, 1978.
          11.   Priester WA, Mantel N: Occurrence of tumors in domestic ani-   26.   Kwapien  RP, Giles RC, Geil RG, et  al.: Malignant mammary
              mals. Data from 12 United States and Canadian colleges of veteri-  tumors in beagle dogs dosed with investigational oral contraceptive
              nary medicine, J Natl Cancer Inst 47:1333–1344, 1971.  steroids, J Natl Cancer Inst 65:137–144, 1980.
          12.   Brodey RS, Goldschmidt MH, Roszel JR: Canine mammary gland    27.   Selman PJ, van Garderen E, Mol JA, et al.: Comparison of the
              neoplasms, J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 19:61–90, 1983.       histological changes in the dog after treatment with the progestins
          13.   Kurzman ID, Gilbertson SR: Prognostic factors in canine mam-  medroxyprogesterone acetate and proligestone, Vet Q 17:128–133,
              mary tumors, Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim) 1:25–32, 1986.  1995.
          14.   Taylor GN, Shabestari L, Williams J, et al.: Mammary neoplasia in    28.   Geil RG, Lamar JK: Fda studies of estrogen, progestogens, and
              a closed beagle colony, Cancer Res 36:2740–2743, 1976.  estrogen/progestogen combinations in the dog and monkey, J Toxi-
          15.   Sorenmo KU, Kristiansen VM, Cofone MA, et al.: Canine mam-  col Environ Health 3:179–193.
              mary gland tumours; a histological continuum from benign to    29.   Yamagami T, Kobayashi T, Takahashi K, et al.: Prognosis for canine
              malignant; clinical and histopathological evidence, Vet Comp Oncol   malignant mammary tumors based on tnm and histologic classifi-
              7:162–172, 2009.                                      cation, J Vet Med Sci 58:1079–1083, 1996.
   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647