Page 642 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 642
620 PART IV Specific Malignancies in the Small Animal Patient
TABLE 28.8 Prognostic Factors and Indications for Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Level of Supporting Evidence in
Cats with Malignant Mammary Tumors
VetBooks.ir Tumor Size Lymph Node Involvement Histopathologic Indication for Evidence Level a
Chemotherapy No or Yes
Parameters
<2 cm /8 cm 3 Negative Carcinoma No 1 220
Yes b 3 210,217,221
2–3 cm/8–27 cm 3 Negative Carcinoma No 3 219,222
Yes b 3 210,217,221
>3 cm/ 27 cm 3 Negative Carcinoma Yes 1, 220 2, 199 3 219,222
Any Positive Carcinoma Yes 2, 199 3, 217 5 80
a Evidence level 1: Prospective randomized trial; level 2: Prospective, nonrandomized trial; level 3: Retrospective; level 5: Extrapolation from human breast cancer studies.
b Vascular invasion and high grade were found to be independent negative prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.
References 16. Goldschmidt M, Shofer FS, Smelstoys JA: Neoplastic lesions of the
mammary gland. In Mohr U, Carlton WW, Dungworth DL, et al.:
1. Dorn CR, Taylor DO, Schneider R, et al.: Survey of animal neo- Pathobiology of the aging dog. Ames, Iowa State University Press,
plasms in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California. II. 2001, pp 168–178.
Cancer morbidity in dogs and cats from Alameda County, J Natl 17. Rivera P, Melin M, Biagi T, et al.: Mammary tumor develop-
Cancer Inst 40:307–318, 1968. ment in dogs is associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2, Cancer Res
2. Moe L: Population-based incidence of mammary tumours in some 69:8770–8774, 2009.
dog breeds, J Reprod Fertil Suppl 57:439–443, 2001. 18. Schneider R, Dorn CR, Taylor DO: Factors influencing canine
3. Egenvall A, Bonnett BN, Ohagen P, et al.: Incidence of and sur- mammary cancer development and postsurgical survival, J Natl
vival after mammary tumors in a population of over 80,000 insured Cancer Inst 43:1249–1261, 1969.
female dogs in sweden from 1995 to 2002, Prev Vet Med 69:109– 19. Sonnenschein EG, Glickman LT, Goldschmidt MH, et al.: Body
127, 2005. conformation, diet, and risk of breast cancer in pet dogs: a case-
4. Dobson JM, Samuel S, Milstein H, et al.: Canine neoplasia in the control study, Am J Epidemiol 133:694–703, 1991.
UK: estimates of incidence rates from a population of insured dogs, 20. Misdorp W: Canine mammary tumours: protective effect of late
J Small Anim Pract 43:240–246, 2002. ovariectomy and stimulating effect of progestins, Vet Q 10:26–33,
5. Bronden LB, Nielsen SS, Toft N, et al.: Data from the danish vet- 1988.
erinary cancer registry on the occurrence and distribution of neo- 21. Kristiansen VM, Nodtvedt A, Breen AM, et al.: Effect of ovariohys-
plasms in dogs in Denmark, Vet Rec 166:586–590, 2010. terectomy at the time of tumor removal in dogs with benign mam-
6. Merlo DF, Rossi L, Pellegrino C, et al.: Cancer incidence in pet mary tumors and hyperplastic lesions: a randomized controlled
dogs: findings of the animal tumor registry of genoa, Italy, J Vet clinical trial, J Vet Intern Med 27:935–942, 2013.
Intern Med 22:976–984, 2008. 22. Brodey RS, Fidler IJ, Howson AE: The relationship of estrous irreg-
7. Vascellari M, Capello K, Carminato A, et al.: Incidence of mam- ularity, pseudopregnancy, and pregnancy to the development of
mary tumors in the canine population living in the veneto region canine mammary neoplasms, J Am Vet Med Assoc 149:1047–1049,
(northeastern Italy): risk factors and similarities to human breast 1966.
cancer, Prev Vet Med 126:183–189, 2016. 23. Stovring M, Moe L, Glattre E: A population-based case-control
8. Salas Y, Marquez A, Diaz D, et al: Epidemiological study of study of canine mammary tumours and clinical use of medroxy-
mammary tumors in female dogs diagnosed during the period progesterone acetate, APMIS 105:590–596, 1997.
2002–2012: a growing animal health problem, PLoS One 24. Concannon PW, Spraker TR, Casey HW, et al.: Gross and histo-
10:e0127381. pathologic effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate and progester-
9. Benjamin SA, Lee AC, Saunders WJ: Classification and behavior of one on the mammary glands of adult beagle bitches, Fertil Steril
canine mammary epithelial neoplasms based on life-span observa- 36:373–387, 1981.
tions in beagles, Vet Pathol 36:423–436, 1999. 25. Giles RC, Kwapien RP, Geil RG, et al.: Mammary nodules in bea-
10. Schneider R: Comparison of age, sex, and incidence rates in human gle dogs administered investigational oral contraceptive steroids,
and canine breast cancer, Cancer 26:419–426, 1970. J Natl Cancer Inst 60:1351–1364, 1978.
11. Priester WA, Mantel N: Occurrence of tumors in domestic ani- 26. Kwapien RP, Giles RC, Geil RG, et al.: Malignant mammary
mals. Data from 12 United States and Canadian colleges of veteri- tumors in beagle dogs dosed with investigational oral contraceptive
nary medicine, J Natl Cancer Inst 47:1333–1344, 1971. steroids, J Natl Cancer Inst 65:137–144, 1980.
12. Brodey RS, Goldschmidt MH, Roszel JR: Canine mammary gland 27. Selman PJ, van Garderen E, Mol JA, et al.: Comparison of the
neoplasms, J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 19:61–90, 1983. histological changes in the dog after treatment with the progestins
13. Kurzman ID, Gilbertson SR: Prognostic factors in canine mam- medroxyprogesterone acetate and proligestone, Vet Q 17:128–133,
mary tumors, Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim) 1:25–32, 1986. 1995.
14. Taylor GN, Shabestari L, Williams J, et al.: Mammary neoplasia in 28. Geil RG, Lamar JK: Fda studies of estrogen, progestogens, and
a closed beagle colony, Cancer Res 36:2740–2743, 1976. estrogen/progestogen combinations in the dog and monkey, J Toxi-
15. Sorenmo KU, Kristiansen VM, Cofone MA, et al.: Canine mam- col Environ Health 3:179–193.
mary gland tumours; a histological continuum from benign to 29. Yamagami T, Kobayashi T, Takahashi K, et al.: Prognosis for canine
malignant; clinical and histopathological evidence, Vet Comp Oncol malignant mammary tumors based on tnm and histologic classifi-
7:162–172, 2009. cation, J Vet Med Sci 58:1079–1083, 1996.