Page 639 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 639

CHAPTER 28  Tumors of the Mammary Gland  617


           the remaining MGs is important when evaluating a cat with   TABLE 28.7     Staging of Feline Mammary Tumors 201
           a prior history of MGTs, especially if treated with local mas-                 Lymph Node
           tectomy, because new primary tumors are common. Tumor(s)
  VetBooks.ir  size at diagnosis depends on how early it is detected and how   Stage  Tumor Size  Status  Metastasis
           aggressive the tumor behaves. Larger tumors may become
           ulcerated, inflamed, and infected. Local LNs may or may not   Stage I  T 1  <2 cm  N 0       M 0
           appear enlarged. Inflammatory mammary carcinomas are rare   Stage II  T 2  2–3 cm  N 0       M 0
           in cats and the clinical picture and outcome are similar to those   Stage III  N 1  (positive)
           described in the dog. 200                                         T 1  or T 2  N 0  or N 1   M 0
                                                                             T 3  >3 cm
                                                                                                        M 0
           Clinical Assessment, Diagnosis, Workup, and             Stage IV  Any          Any           M 1
           Clinical Staging                                        From McNeill CJ, Sorenmo KU, Shofer FS, et al.: Evaluation of adjuvant doxorubicin-based
                                                                   chemotherapy for the treatment of feline mam mary carcinoma, J Vet Intern Med 23:123–129,
           Cats with mammary masses tend to be older and their tumors   2009.
           are commonly malignant; therefore a thorough workup is recom-
           mended to ascertain any comorbidity and advanced disease. This
           may include CBC, serum biochemistry, serum T  concentration,   fibroadenomatous change. 209  Fibroadenomatous change (fibroep-
                                                 4
           three-view thoracic radiographs, abdominal ultrasound, and uri-  ithelial hyperplasia, fibroepithelial hypertrophy, mammary hyper-
           nalysis, in addition to FNA of any mammary masses and any pal-  trophy) is common in the cat, usually affects several glands, and
           pable (including normal-sized) regional LNs.          is characterized by the proliferation of interlobular ducts, tubules,
                                                                 and periductal stromal cells. The stroma is often edematous or
           Staging System                                        myxomatous,  and  both  the  epithelial  and  stromal  cell  nuclei
           Feline MGTs are staged similar to canine tumors using a modi-  exhibit some pleomorphism with mitoses. This lesion is hormon-
           fication of the original system published by Owen. 124,201  In the   ally induced and occurs in progestin-treated female and male cats,
           modified system, stage advances from I to II to III as the size   as well as being associated with pregnancy. Most cases regress at
           increases from smaller than 2 cm, to between 2 and 3 cm, to   the end of pregnancy or cessation of progestin treatment. 128,202  
           larger than 3 cm. 125  Unlike the canine system, stage III disease
           also includes T1 or T2 tumors with concurrent LN metastasis   Benign Feline Mammary Neoplasms
           and LN metastasis does not need to be present with T3 tumors.
           Stage IV disease is any tumor with any LN metastasis and distant   Benign tumors in cats are uncommon and include simple ade-
           metastasis. 201  This staging system should not be used with MG   noma, ductal adenoma, fibroadenoma, and intraductal papillary
           sarcomas (see Table 28.6).                            adenoma (duct papilloma). 128,202  

           Histopathology
           The vast majority of feline MGTs are malignant (85%–95%)   Malignant Mammary Neoplasms
           with an aggressive biologic behavior, and lymphatic invasion and   The predominant malignant tumor types in cats are simple
           LN metastasis are more common at the time of initial diagnosis   and epithelial in origin and as such represent carcinomas of
           than in dogs. Early classifications of feline MGTs were simpler   various  types.  Tubular  carcinomas,  tubulopapillary  carcino-
           than that used for canine tumors. 128  Complex and mixed tumors   mas,  and  solid carcinomas  are  most  common.  Other  vari-
           showing the same features of the canine counterparts have not   ants include cystic-papillary carcinoma, cribriform carcinoma
           been diagnosed in the feline MG; however, new and previously   (when tubules are  nearly  undetectable),  micropapillary inva-
           unclassified subtypes have been reported. 202  Morphologic features   sive carcinoma, comedocarcinoma, anaplastic carcinoma,
           of each subtype are identical to the canine counterparts and, as   intraductal papillary carcinoma, ductal carcinoma, and, less
           per dogs, the predominant morphologic pattern is used to classify   commonly, squamous cell carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma,
           the tumor.                                            lipid-rich carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, and spindle
             Similar to dogs, a molecular approach to MGT classification   cell carcinoma. 128,197,200,202,209–216  
           has  been attempted  in  cats. 203–208   Despite  lack  of standardized
           methods and variability of results, mammary carcinomas in cats   Histopathologic Prognostic Factors and Grading
           were associated with the highest percentage of triple-negative
           (HR– and HER-2–) MGTs, associated with frequent expression   Grading was initially thought not to be prognostic in cats;
           of both basal cytokeratins and vimentin, and had the worst prog-  therefore the classification of mammary tumors was based
           nosis. This seems to suggest that the cat may be a suitable model   on morphologic criteria only. More recently, histologic grad-
           for some subtypes of human BC, such as the HR-independent   ing using a system similar to that in dogs (see  Tables 28.3
           basal-like cancers.                                   and  28.4a)  has  been  shown  to  be  prognostic  in  cats. 210,217
                                                                 In addition to histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion and
           Hyperplasia and Dysplasia                             LN metastasis are independent prognostic factors. 210,217  Thus
                                                                 the histopathologic criteria used in dogs (i.e., grade, vascular
           The various hyperplastic and dysplastic lesions seen in cats   invasion, LN status) can be used in cats when assessing risk
           include duct ectasia, lobular hyperplasia (regular, with secretory   for metastasis and prognosis, and should be incorporated into
           [lactational] activity, with fibrosis [interlobular fibrous connec-  decisions regarding the need for systemic treatment in cats
           tive tissue], and with atypia), epitheliosis, papillomatosis, and   with MGTs (Table 28.7).
   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644