Page 637 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 637

CHAPTER 28  Tumors of the Mammary Gland  615



            TABLE 28.6     Summary of Published Studies Reporting Benefit from Systemic Therapy in Dogs with Malignant
                        Mammary Tumors
  VetBooks.ir  Tumor Stage  Grade/Histopathology  Treatment                   Comments and Effect      Reference
                                               Cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil vs none
                                                                              Evidence level 2
                                                                                        a
                                                                                                       226
             Stage III–IV
                          Any grade
                          Various carcinomas                                  DFS: p < 0.01
             Stage I–IV   Grade 3              NSAID: firocoxib vs none       Evidence level 2         160
                          Various carcinomas                                  DFS: p = 0.015
             Stage IV–V   Grade: NA            Carboplatin +/–                Evidence level 2         163
                                               NSAIDs vs none                 OS: p = 0.07 b
             Advanced     Inflammatory carcinomas  NSAIDs +/– chemotherapy vs None  Evidence level 3   102
                                                                              Palliative intent
                                                                              OS: p = 0.01
             Advanced     Inflammatory carcinomas  NSAID (piroxicam) vs doxorubicin  Evidence level 3  162
                                                                              Palliative intent
                                                                              PFS: p < 0.01
             Stage I      Grades 1, 2          Hormonal Tx                    Evidence level 1 p = 0.002–0.02  154
                          Complex and mixed    Antiprogestin (aglepristone) vs none
                          carcinomas, PR+
             Stage I–IV   Grade 2              Hormonal Tx                    Evidence level 1 p = 0.03  79
                                               OHE vs intact
             Stage III–IV  Grades 2, 3         DDAVP (desmopressin) vs none   Evidence level 1         165
                          Various carcinomas                                  DSF: p = 0.001
             NA           Extraskeletal        Doxorubicin or cisplatin vs none  Evidence level 3      164
                          Osteosarcoma, including                             Mixed primary sites
                            mammary                                           OS: p = 0.02
             a Evidence level 1: Prospective randomized trial; level 2: Prospective, nonrandomized trial; level 3: Retrospective; level 4: Case report(s); level 5: Extrapolation from human breast cancer studies.
             b Significance set at p = 0.1.
             NSAID, Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug; OST, overall survival time; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, progesterone receptor.


           Mammary Tumors in Cats                                in the source population because no information regarding OHE
                                                                 status was provided. 
           Epidemiology and Risk Factors
           Epidemiology                                          Risk Factors
           There are fewer epidemiologic studies regarding the incidence of   Three main risk factors in cats have been identified: age, breed,
           mammary neoplasia in cats compared with dogs. Furthermore,   and hormonal influence.
           because of differences in veterinary care for cats, the available
           data likely underestimate the true incidence of disease. Accord-  Age
           ing to data from one of the largest Swedish insurance companies,   As in the dog, mammary neoplasia is a disease seen predominantly
           approximately 40% to 50 % of all dogs had insurance to cover   in middle-aged to older cats. The mean age of diagnosis is between
           veterinary expenses, whereas only 20% of cats had such cover-  10 and 12 years of age. 1,172–175  Risk increases incrementally with
           age. 168,169  Another study from the United States also reported that   age but does not become significant until 7 to 9 years, according
           a significantly lower percentage of cats receives regular veterinary   to the age-specific incidence curves from the CANR, and contin-
                                                                                              1
           care compared with dogs. 170                          ues to increase up until 12 to 14 years.  
             The overall MGT incidence is lower in cats than in dogs.
           According to the California Animal Neoplasia Registry (CANR),   Breed
           MGTs represent the third most common tumor in female cats   Siamese cats are significantly younger when diagnosed with MGTs
           (after skin tumors and lymphoma) with an annual incidence rate   and risk plateaus at 9 years of age. 176  In general, genetic predispo-
           of 25.4/100,000 and 12% of tumors in cats regardless of sex.    sition for a disease is often associated with a younger age of diag-
                                                            1
           Data from an animal tumor registry from two provinces in north-  nosis. Siamese cats appear overrepresented compared with other
           ern Italy reported that MGTs represented 16% of all tumors in   breeds. 176,177  However, Siamese cats have an increased risk for
           cats and 25% in female cats. 171  Data from a Swedish insurance   many tumor types and not only MGTs. 178–182  It is therefore pos-
           company indicate that MGTs were the most common cancer rep-  sible that the increased incidence in Siamese cats is due to breed-
           resenting 40% of all tumor-related claims in cats. 168  It is unclear   associated germline alterations in common tumor susceptibility
           whether the higher relative incidence of MGTs in the latter stud-  genes or defective tumor suppressor gene function that confers
           ies is due to differences in neutering practices or use of progestins   increased risk for many different malignancies. 
   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642