Page 817 - Veterinary Immunology, 10th Edition
P. 817

VetBooks.ir  Vaccination Strategies





               Although vaccination is a powerful tool for the control of infectious
               disease, its potential to prevent the spread of or eliminate a disease

               depends on selecting correct control strategies. If an infectious
               disease outbreak, such as one caused by foot-and-mouth virus, is to
               be rapidly controlled, it is vitally important to select the correct
               population to be vaccinated. The success of any mass vaccination
               program depends both on the proportion of animals vaccinated and

               on the efficacy of the vaccine. Neither of these factors will reach
               100%, so it is essential to target the vaccine effectively. It is also the
               case that vaccines do not confer immediate protection, so the

               strategy employed will depend on the rate of spread of an infection.
               Vaccines may thus be given prophylactically, in advance of an
               outbreak, or reactively, in response to an existing outbreak. Both
               strategies have advantages and disadvantages. In general,
               prophylactic vaccination greatly reduces the potential for a major

               epidemic of a disease such as foot-and-mouth disease by reducing
               the size of the susceptible population. The effectiveness of this
               approach can be greatly enhanced by identifying high-risk

               individuals and ensuring that they are protected in advance of an
               outbreak.
                  It is generally not feasible to vaccinate an entire population of
               animals once a disease outbreak has occurred. However, two
               effective reactive vaccination strategies are ring vaccination, which

               seeks to contain an outbreak by establishing a barrier of immune
               animals around an infected area, and predictive vaccination, which
               seeks to vaccinate the animals on farms likely to contribute most to

               the future spread of disease. Reactive vaccination in this way can
               ensure that an epidemic is not unduly prolonged. A prolonged
               “tail” to an epidemic commonly results from the disease “jumping”
               to a new area. Well-considered, predictive vaccination may well
               prevent these jumps. Thus a combination of prophylactic and

               reactive vaccination will likely yield the most effective results.











                                                         817
   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822