Page 115 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 115

5.4  Adult Life  87

  VetBooks.ir  5.4   Adult Life                       has been studied in primates, birds, and fish
                                                      (e.g. Crockford et  al. 2007; Oliveira et  al.
                                                      1998; Peake 2005), and the ability of an ani-
             5.4.1  Being Social
                                                      mal  to  learn  its  relative  position  within  a
             Learning to be social encompasses how and   group has been studied in primates
             when to interact with conspecifics and   (Tomasello and Call 1997). Furthermore,
             understanding social cues and rules. In a zoo   being able to use what has been learned to
             setting, social group membership can change   exploit others in a social group, known as
             regularly with births, deaths, and between‐  ‘Machiavellian  intelligence’  (Gavrilets  and
             zoo transfers, thus requiring animals to learn   Vose 2006; Whiten and Byrne 1997), is seen
             how to regularly recognise individuals and   as the highest level of social intelligence. In
             establish and maintain social bonds. The   captive settings, primates have learned to
             myriad of ways that animals learn to recog-  deceive their groupmates and hide knowl-
             nise group members is beyond the scope of   edge from others in elaborately competitive
             this chapter, but briefly this can be via scent,   strategies (Byrne and Whiten 1989). The
             sound and vision (Shettleworth 2010). Scent‐  ‘social politics’ of zoo chimpanzees was pop-
             based learning can be difficult in zoo exhibits   ularised by de Waal and de Waal (2007), but
             where hygiene standards are paramount; fre-  is  not  only confined  to great apes; there is
             quent cleaning with disinfectant could mark   also perhaps some evidence for Machiavellian
             or remove natural scents (Clark and King   intelligence in fish (Bshary 2011).
             2008). Songbirds are amongst the best‐stud-  Zoo exhibits that house more than one spe-
             ied vocal learners, with research showing   cies,  referred  to  as  ‘mixed‐species  exhibits’
             that individuals need to hear themselves sing   are commonplace in modern zoos, allowing
             to develop song normally (Brainard and   species with the same ecological niche or
             Doupe 2000). Elephants are also vocal learn-  from the same geographical area to be housed
             ers; Poole et al. (2005) showed that captive   together (Clark and Melfi 2012; see
             African elephants (Loxodonta africana) can   Figure 5.3). These exhibits provide an addi-
             modify their vocalisations in response to   tional layer of social opportunity and learning
             vocalisations they have previously heard. In   the meaning of both homo‐ and heterospe-
             the  zoo,  anthropogenic  noise  coming  from   cific cues.  Different  species  can  sometimes
             visitors and amplified sound systems could   learn from each other; Krebs (1973) found
             disrupt the learning and maintenance of   that two species of chickadees (Parus spp.)
               animal song and other vocalisations.   learned from one another about the location
             Anthropogenic sound measurement and      and  nature  of  potential  feeding  locations
             analysis in relation to zoo animal well‐being   when they were housed together in a large,
             is in its infancy, but we can expect to see   mixed species aviary. Heterospecific social
             more of this research emerging in the next   learning (i.e. social learning from one species
             few years (Orban et al. 2017). A number of   to another) was observed in a mixed‐species
             mammals and birds are also capable of visu-  zoo exhibit of tufted capuchins (Sapajus sp.)
             ally discriminating between familiar and   and common squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciu-
             unfamiliar individuals, and in some species   reus); capuchins were influenced by squirrel
             this is based on facial patterns (e.g. Brown   monkeys when foraging for food in mixed
             and Dooling 1992; Kendrick et  al. 1995;   species groups (Messer 2013).
             Rosenfeld and Van Hoesen 1979). Recent    For many species in a zoo setting, being
             research also suggests that cichlid fish are   social also encompasses interactions and
             capable of conspecific face recognition   relationships with caregivers, known more
             (Hotta et al. 2017; Satoh et al. 2016).  formally as ‘human–animal interactions’ and
               The ability of an animal to be a bystander   ‘human–animal relationships’ (Hosey and
             and ‘eavesdrop’ on the social status of others   Melfi 2014; see Chapter  9 and Figure  5.4).
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120