Page 136 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 136

108  6  Environmental Enrichment: Opportunities for Learning

              Auditory stimuli often in the form of con-
  VetBooks.ir  specific vocalisations have been used in envi-  speech. It has been suggested that music for
                                                     animals should be based on the species’
            ronmental enrichment studies (Rukstalis and
                                                     was carried out on primates, showed they
            French  2005;  Simonet  et  al.  2005;  Kelling   vocalisation structures. A study where this
            et al. 2012). However, if such calls are used   paid  more  attention  to  the  ‘monkey  music’
            frequently with no contingency to the behav-  than to human music (Snowdon and Teie
            ioural response, then animals will learn to   2013). The same was found by Snowdon et al.
            habituate to such calls, change its behaviour   (2015) for domestic cats.
            or even be stressed by the calls (Harris and   The use of olfactory enrichment has
            Haskell 2013; Massen et al. 2014). For exam-  increased in recent times, despite the fact
            ple, predator warning calls, which are emit-  that humans have relatively poor olfactory
            ted without showing an appropriate predator   abilities (Clark and King 2008; Laska 2017).
            model, may soon lose their ability to modify   But as with other sensory stimuli it is impor-
            animal  behaviour  (Griffin et  al.  2000), but   tant that either there is some natural contin-
            some species can retain the capacity of pred-  gency between the stimulus presented and
            ator call recognition over evolutionary time   consequences for the animals (e.g. arrival of
            (Hettena et al. 2014). The use of such calls as   food or a model predator) or that each stimu-
            environmental enrichment is considered by   lus is used infrequently. Predator scents have
            some organisations as questionable in terms   been shown to be effective in eliciting anti-
            of their impact on animal welfare, since they   predatory responses in many prey species
            provoke an antipredatory response and pred-  without the need for the appearance of a
            ators are a source of stress.            predator model (Apfelbach et al. 2005; Rosell
              In  many  species,  such  as  birds,  juveniles   et al. 2013). For example, the smell of a jaguar
            learn their species‐specific vocalisations   on llama wool is sufficient for giant anteaters
            from listening to other members of their   to start rushing around their enclosure in an
            social group and need to practice these   escape response (Orlando  and Fernández
            vocalisations for them to be perfected (Payne   2014). But of course such stimuli must be
            et  al.  2000;  Catchpole  and  Slater  2008).   applied sparingly, for a short period of time
            Furthermore, many vocalisations will only be   (a few minutes only) and in a manner that the
            expressed once the appropriate stimulus has   stimulus can be fully removed from the ani-
            been presented such as the sight of a preda-  mal’s enclosure. If this stimulus is prolonged,
            tor or the territorial vocalisation of a conspe-  it could distress the animals since they would
            cific (Hollén and Radford 2009). Territorial   not be able to flee from the supposed preda-
            vocalisations were once popularly used as   tor, decreasing their welfare.
            auditory environmental enrichment for spe-  Other scents that can be used to enrich the
            cies such as gibbons who would respond to   lives of captive animals are scents used to
            them with their own territorial call     mark the boundaries of territories, such as
            (Shepherdson et al. 1999). Beyond the vocal   those used by big cats or primates such as
            response, animals subjected to such territo-  lemurs. The careful placing of such scents at
            rial  challenges  often  show  enhanced  social   the edges of an enclosure will teach an animal
            behaviour and potentially have stronger   about the limits of its territory (Campbell‐
            social bonds.                            Palmer and Rosell 2010; Jackson et al. 2012).
              Finally in terms of auditory enrichment the   In captivity, it is important that scent marking
            use of music as a stimulus has been popular   is not constantly removed during the cleaning
            ever since studies showed that cows listening   process because in species, which counter-
            to classical music or calf vocalisations pro-  mark (mark over other individual’s scents)
            duced  more  milk  (McCowan  et  al.  2002;   this could be perceived as another individual
            O’Brien 2014). The structure of music for   invading their territory causing significant
            humans is related to the structure of human   stress to the enclosure’s occupant.
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141