Page 308 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 308

280  11  Welfare Implications of Zoo Animal Training

  VetBooks.ir  Spinelli 1986). The aim of which was to train   polar bears were less likely to show stereo-
                                                     typic behaviour if a training programme were
            animals to perform behaviours which would
            improve their welfare; this developed into
                                                     findings were reported by Shyne and Block
            the phenomenon of environmental enrich-  included in their husbandry routine. Similar
            ment as practised widely now (see Chapter 6).   (2010) in African wild dogs which were
            We might train animals to show fewer     trained for veterinary care, but during peri-
            aggressive behaviours towards us  (Minier   ods when training was provided, the dogs
            et al. 2011), as we don’t like to think that the   spend  less time  performing stereotypic
            animals don’t want to be in proximity to us.   behaviours. In a study where both training
            Another argument for training animals to   and play (via human–animal interactions)
            perform behaviours we like the look of, and/  were provided to a group of zoo housed
            or are conducive to good animal welfare, is   gorillas, a variety of behavioural indicators
            that by performing these behaviours, the ani-  associated with poor welfare were seen to
            mal changes and becomes more like the    reduce (stereotypies, behaviour directed at
            behaviour it has been trained to display. Data   visitors, aggression, and inactivity), whilst
            do exist within the laboratory primate litera-  behaviours  associated with good  welfare
            ture, where primates have been trained to be   were seen to rise (affiliative and social play‐
            more social; this was executed by using posi-  related behaviours; Carrasco et  al. 2009).
            tive reinforcement training of ‘less socially   Importantly this final study found that the
            engaged’ primates when they sat next to or   positive ramifications associated with the
            made physical contact with another primate   training programme were seen in all animals
            (e.g. Schapiro et al. 2003).             in the group, even though training was not
              Coleman  and  Maier (2010)  found  the   provided to all animals in the group.
            inclusion of a training programme reduced   Interestingly, in another group of zoo housed
            the performed behaviour and stereotypies in   gorillas, behavioural change  (reduced ear
            a group of laboratory housed rhesus      covering and keeper‐directed aggression)
            macaques. The macaques were not explicitly   was observed not during a period when
            trained not to show stereotypies, but instead   training was provided but afterwards
            were trained for venepuncture. The authors   (Figure  11.5).  The  authors  suggest  that  a
            suggested that the training might have func-  combination of training and increased
            tioned by alleviating boredom and stress.   human–animal interactions were likely the
            Shepherdson et  al. (2013) also noted that   cause the behavioural change.























            Figure 11.5  Studies have shown that training and human–animal interactions can increase play behaviour in
            gorillas. Source: Ryan Summers https://www.flickr.com/photos/oddernod/35106444790.
   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313