Page 312 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 312

284  11  Welfare Implications of Zoo Animal Training

  VetBooks.ir  are the goal of training, or indirectly during   11.7   Monitoring Animal
            training for other behaviours. A common
                                                     Welfare as Part of Training
            tool when training socially housed animals
            is to ‘station’ them to one spot; reinforce   Programmes
            them for staying still in a specific location in   To enable zoo professionals to assess and evalu-
            the enclosure. The reasons for instigating   ate whether a training regime is beneficial to an
            this type of training could include: ensuring   individual or not, the ability to measure zoo
            that all animals could be trained effectively   animal welfare is key. Currently there are very
            despite being socially housed; ensuring that   few species‐specific tools to measure welfare.
            all animals were able to eat separate por-  The welfare tool for elephants was developed
            tions of food without competition; to reduce   as a response to concerns over elephant welfare
            the risk of aggression during times consid-  in UK zoos (Asher et al. 2015) and was designed
            ered to be problematic; to separate animals   for use by elephant keepers to provide quick
            when they are engaged in aggressive behav-  and reliable daily monitoring to be evaluated
            iour towards each other; maximising animal   over time. Other species‐specific tools such as
            visibility within an enclosure. Bloomsmith   the one developed for dolphins (Tursiops trun-
            et al. (1998) trained an adult male chimpan-  catus) (Clegg et  al. 2015) or Dorcas Gazelles
            zee during meal times to sit and not  perform   (Gazella dorcus) (Salas et al. 2018) were based
            aggressive behaviours towards cage‐mates.   on farm animal welfare   protocols such as
            They observed that this training did not   Welfare Quality® and have a mixture of animal‐
            generalise to conditions outside of the train-  based (parameters of an animals’ behaviour/
            ing situation (feeding time) and yet enabled   physiology) and resource‐based (parameters
            all members of the chimpanzee group to   including the environmental conditions or pro-
            feed without aggression. This study demon-  visions) measures. With only these few specific
            strates welfare benefits can be conferred by   toolkits available, reliably assessing animal wel-
            training social restraint; which no doubt go   fare on multiple grounds is difficult, let alone
            further in yield gains for husbandry and   with a specific focus on training.
            mission goals. It would be interesting to see
            further empirical data, about the impact of
            such trained social restraint in other spe-
            cies. It would be especially interesting to   Take Away Message
            explore how training might impact the
            integrity  of  the  social  hierarchy,  which   Training provides zoo professionals with a
            would ordinarily be set by the dominant   tool by which they can effectively manipulate
            animal(s) in the group, and instead removes   the behaviour of animals in their care. This
            that  animal(s)  control of  the group and   has led to many welfare benefits being asso-
            translates effective governance of the group   ciated with the use of training. The welfare
            to the trainer. Within the paradigm of the   impacts of training however, should not be
            human–animal interactions, it is unclear,   determined by whether its application was
            whether this exchange of ‘dominant’ would   intended to benefit the participating animals,
            mean that the trainer is perceived to be part   but result from empirical monitoring of its
            of  the social hierarchy, which would  have   application. Training is an extremely strong
            implications of its own, or if the dominant   tool, which enables you to exert control over
            animal’s thwarted attempts to gain priority   the actions of an animal, by determining
            access to all resources might convey nega-  which behaviours you feel it should perform.
            tive ramifications. Either way, it seems rea-  It is important therefore, to fully understand
            sonable that altering the social hierarchy   the impact you’re having when you train; and
            will have impacts on behaviour and welfare   what you might add, or remove, from the life
            outside of the training event.           of that animal as a consequence.
   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317