Page 32 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 32

4  1  Learning Theory

                                                      Anthropomorphism refers to the attribu­
  VetBooks.ir  of keys at that time means food is being   tion of human traits, such as language or
            provided.
              Now that we have a better sense of the
                                                     maintain anthropocentric biases. For example,
            term learning, let’s move on to an overview   emotion, to other animals. It is often used to
            of animal learning theory. In the rest of the   Dr Seuss’s Cat in the Hat features a cat that
            chapter you should expect the discussion   walks upright, speaks perfect English and
            of the history and expansion on the types   wears human cloths in a similar way to a
            of learning that will be important as we   human. Anthropomorphism also charac­
            continue further into the book.          terises many Disney movies, for example
                                                     Finding Nemo, The Incredible Mr. Fox, Bambi.
                                                     All these movies give human characteristics
            1.2   Individual Learning                to animal  species. Animal professionals
                                                     know that although an animal’s behaviour
            A great place to start to explain individual   mimics a behaviour engendered by a human
            learning is with the work of Edward      in a similar setting, it may be explained in a
            Thorndike.  Although  there were  scientists   different  way.  One  reason  for  this  is  parsi­
            before him who referred to animal behaviour   mony. Scientists look for the most parsimo­
            (such as Darwin, Romanes, and Morgan),   nious,  or  simple,  explanations  of  observed
            Thorndike was the first to study animal   behaviour. Between two equally good expla­
            behaviour empirically. Before Thorndike,   nations, choose the simpler. For example,
            scientists observed animal behaviour in   you may come home to the living room
              naturalistic settings. They collected anecdo­  covered in what used to be the stuffing of
            tal accounts from a variety of people (pet   very expensive pillows. Your sweet playful
            owners, amateur nature enthusiasts, military   dog got bored and found a way to entertain
            officers, etc.) and compiled them as evidence   himself. You look at your dog only to see
            for a hypothesis or theory.              those big droopy eyes, tucked tail, dropped
              This anecdotal approach was not just   ears, and him backing up very slowly. You
            anthropocentric  but  anthropomorphic.   think to yourself ‘he looks guilty and knows
            Anthropocentrism is when a person regards   that what he has done is wrong’. However, the
            human  beings  as  the  central  or  most  sig­  most parsimonious explanation is that he is
            nificant species on the planet. An anthropo­  actually reacting to your body language (tone
            centric person may believe that humankind   in your voice, staring in your dog’s eyes,
            has unique abilities superior to those of   moving erratically, not greeting your dog as
            other animals. For example, some scientists,   you normally would, etc.). Indeed, experiments
            like Romanes, used animal models to prove   have shown this body‐language explanation
            animals could think and solve problems the   to be the better explanation (Horowitz 2003).
            way people do. Instead of studying animal   Thorndike was the first to introduce exper­
            behaviour in its own right, he tried to model   imental methods with animals in 1898. What
            their behaviour to meet that of human stand­  were these methods … to put a cat in a box of
            ards. For example, he had a few anecdotal   course!
            ‘experiments’  where  he  trapped  ants  and   Thorndike was a very unconventional
            watched to see if their mound‐mates helped   scientist for his time. He didn’t have a labora­
            free them. He wrote ‘I next covered one up   tory, but kept his subjects (chickens, cats,
            with a piece of clay, leaving only the ends of   dogs, fish, and monkeys) in his own home
            its antennae projecting. It was soon discovered   ‘until the landlady’s protests were imperative’
            by its fellows, which set to work immediately,   (Thorndike 1936, p.  264). He also felt  that
            and  by  biting  off  pieces  of  the clay soon   previous scientists paid too much attention
            liberated it’ (Romanes 1888, p. 48).     to animal intelligence and although he took
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37