Page 35 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 35

1.4  Operant Conditioning  7

  VetBooks.ir  psychoanalysis, saying  that, ‘When  they   physiology departments. Each department
                                                      assumed the other was supervising Skinner,
             [Freudians] come to analyse [Little] Albert’s
             fear of a [white] seal skin coat, assuming that
                                                      Skinner had the freedom to do whatever he
             he [Little Albert] comes to analysis at that age,   which wasn’t the case. Without supervision,
             [Freudians]  will  probably  tease  him  on the   wanted! One of the first things he did was build
             recital of a dream which upon their analysis   new equipment. Skinner found Thorndike’s
             will show that Albert at three years of age   experimental setup to be lacking, because the
             attempted to play with the pubic hair of the   researcher had to place the cat in the puzzle box
             mother and was scolded violently for it’ (p.   after every trial. To fix this flaw, Skinner invented
             14). Clearly, Watson believed behaviour could   the Skinner box, or operant chamber. The oper­
             be better explained by ones environment and   ant chamber contained a bar or key that the ani­
             the consequences encountered during his life­  mal pressed to obtain food. Food was delivered
             time and not on unconscious thoughts.    by a dispenser called a hopper and a light sig­
               Almost every semester, my students would   nalled the start of an experiment. Data from in
             ask me where Little Albert is today, and whether   the operant chamber were collected electroni­
             he’s still afraid of white rats. Finally, in 2010, I   cally on a  cumulative record. This recorded
             was able to answer. Beck et al. (2009) searched   every response the animal made as an upward
             medical records and historical documents and   movement on a horizontally moving line. This
             worked with facial recognition experts for   record allowed Skinner to collect data on the
             seven years, finally finding a baby and mother   effects of contingencies and on the subject’s rate
             that matched Little Albert. The puzzle pieces   of  responding.  With  this  new  equipment,
             lead them to a boy named Douglas (not Albert)   Skinner showed that the rate of responding
             Merritte.  Sadly,  we  will  never  know  if  Little   depended on what followed the bar press and
             Douglas is still scared of rats because he died at   not what  preceded it. This differed from the
             the age of six from hydrocephalus.       original work of Watson and Pavlov.
               Nowadays classical conditioning is regularly   To further distinguish his findings from
             discussed when training zoo‐housed animals,   Pavlov’s classical conditioning, Skinner coined
             often when  a clicker is involved. If you are an   the term operant conditioning (also known as
             animal trainer, then you may wonder why I   instrumental conditioning). Skinner used
             don’t discuss clickers in this section. For those   ‘operant conditioning’ to refer to how an
             non‐animal trainers,  Clickers are hand‐held   organism operates on the environment. In
             devices that, when pressed, make a clicking   other words, according to Skinner, an animal’s
             sound. Clickers and similar devices (like whis­  own behaviour can cause events in the envi­
             tles) are discussed by animal trainers as condi­  ronment. For example, if the key is turned
             tioned reinforces, because they are paired   then the car starts; if the tail is pulled then the
             with food. However, this has recently been   dog bites; if the target is touched then food is
             questioned (see Dorey & Cox 2018 for a dis­  delivered; if a leash is pulled then the dog is
             cussion on the topic) and more research needs   choked; if the electric fence is touched then
             to be conducted to make this claim.      the animal is shocked. Unlike classical condi­
                                                      tioning, operant conditioning involves the
                                                      consequence occurring only if the animal
             1.4   Operant Conditioning               engages in a particular behaviour, making the
                                                      behaviour more likely to occur in the future.
             Watson, Pavlov and Thorndike set the tone
             for future research in animal behaviour. They   1.4.1  Reinforcement and Punishment
             were major influences on our next scientist,
             B.F. Skinner.                            Although Pavlov originally coined the term
               As a graduate student at Harvard University,   reinforcement to describe the strengthening
             Skinner worked in both the psychology and the   of the association between an unconditioned
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40