Page 67 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 67

3.3  Survival Behaviours ‘Lost’ in Captivity  39

               Soft release techniques may allow animals
  VetBooks.ir  more time to learn about the new environ-  more courtship behaviour. We may expect that
                                                      fish that display higher levels  of  courtship
             ment around them and behaviourally adapt
                                                      higher stocking densities might be more suc-
             accordingly. For example, in bird studies in   behaviour are advantaged. Thus fish reared in
             particular, early dispersal from the release   cessful if included in release programmes, as
             site is cited as a reason for reintroduction   more courtship behaviours and greater aggres-
             failure as the birds do not have the time to   sion directed at rivals would potentially lead to
             form pair bonds (Wang et al. 2017). Crested   more and/or better mates which would lead to
             ibis  (Nipponia  nippon)  under  soft  release   greater  inclusive  fitness.  However  those  fish
             conditions remained closer to the release site   which perform elaborate  courtship  displays
             and flocked more rapidly, compared to those   and territorial fights, are also at risk of higher
             birds which were reintroduced using the   detection  by  predators.  Therefore  as  the
             hard release technique; it is suggested that   author  concluded, captive‐rearing conditions
             both  behaviours  seen  at soft release might   which  promote the development of risk
             offer a social advantage, in terms of facilitat-  adverse behaviours, in this case fewer courtship
             ing the acquisition of mates (Wang et  al.   and aggressive displays, would be favoured for
             2017). Interestingly in this example the sur-  reintroduction (Kelley et al. 2005).
             vival rates of the two groups of birds remained   The ultimate social indicator as to whether
             similar, which poses the question of whether   reintroductions have been successful is the
             soft release programmes are important for   ability of the reintroduced animals to repro-
             encouraging habitat and social behaviours   duce. A review of artic fox (Vulpes lagopus)
             but may not result in a direct survival benefit   reintroductions since 2015 showed that the
             for the released individuals.            release of 385 individuals (over the course of
                                                      7 years) had resulted in 3 stable populations
                                                      and most importantly, estimations that the
             3.3.3  Social Behaviour
                                                      number of wild‐born pups descended from
             The main issue relating to how social behav-  captive individuals had exceeded 600 (Landa
             iour negatively effects reintroduction success   et  al. 2017). Artic fox introduction sites
             seems to revolve around reintroduced animals   included artificial dens and food dispensers;
             inappropriately responding to social cohorts;   methods of provisioning which appear to
             responding to conspecifics with inadequate   convey benefit in allowing the artic foxes
             courtship behaviour which limits breeding   time to learn about their new environment
             opportunities, or engaging in aggression with   through soft release.
             superior adversaries potentially ending  in
             fatality. The importance of captive rearing con-  3.3.4  Feeding and Foraging
             ditions on the exhibition of appropriate social
             behaviour has been demonstrated  in  the   The development of inadequate foraging and
             endangered Mexican fish (Skiffia multipunc-  feeding strategies is another key behavioural
             tata; Kelley et al. 2005). Fish raised in labora-  deficiency reported to lead to either success
             tory conditions (indoor aquaria),  were   or failure in reintroduction programmes. For
             observed to exhibit more courtship  behav-  the same reason that antipredator behaviour
             iours, and were generally more  aggressive   is so essential for successful reintroduction,
             towards competitors, than their counterparts   so too it is imperative that animals do learn
             raised in semi‐natural conditions  (outdoor   how to obtain and process food resources;
             ponds),  either  in  single  taxa  or  mixed  taxa   without these vital survival behaviours the
             groups. This difference in behaviour is poten-  ultimate negative consequence occurs, death.
             tially due to higher stocking densities in labo-  Released animals can differ from wild coun-
             ratory conditions, therefore males were more   terparts in relatively simple aspects of feed-
             likely to encounter females and  thus  display   ing and foraging such as the time of day they
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72