Page 600 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 600

568  Section 6  Gastrointestinal Disease

            Table 53.1  Methods to assess gastric emptying in small animals and their diagnostic usefulness and availability to the practitioner
  VetBooks.ir  Technique                    Information gained     Availability in pets



             Plain radiographs              +                      +++
             Contrast radiographs (barium)  ++                     +++
             Contrast radiographs (BIPS)    +                      ++
             Ultrasonography                +                      ++/+++
             Endoscopy                      (+)                    ++/+++
             13 C‐based breath tests        ++                     + /++ (referral /research)
             Blood tracers (paracetamol)    Unknown                + (if reference method to measure paracetamol is available)
             Scintigraphy                   +++                    + (referral/research)
             CT or MRI                      −                      ++
             Manometry                      ++                     + (referral/ research)
             Wireless motility capsule      +++                    + (referral/ research)
             Surface electrical resistance  (+)                    − (research)
            BIPS, barium‐impregnated polyethylene spheres; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.


            Diagnostic Imaging for Gastric Motility Disorders   of 1.5 mm BIPS also did not parallel “true” gastric empty-
            in Routine Veterinary Practice                    ing of a solid radiolabeled meal, but rather assessed
            Plain abdominal radiographs showing liquid or solid gas-  interdigestive motility. Therefore, interpretation of solid‐
            tric contents after a fasting period of >6–8 hours in the   phase gastric emptying with BIPS cannot be recom-
            dog and >4 hours in the cat should raise the suspicion of   mended in small animals.
            delayed gastric emptying. If no obvious cause can be   Technologic advances have facilitated the availability
            identified, serial radiographic imaging after oral admin-  and feasibility of using abdominal ultrasonography to
            istration  of  contrast  media  (i.e.,  liquid  barium  sulfate,   assess gastric emptying. Even though gastric motility can
            iodinated contrast) can be performed (for the full proto-  be visualized with ultrasound and the frequency of antral
            col see section on small intestinal dysmotility later).  contractions has been reported in healthy dogs (4–6/min
             This method only evaluates emptying of liquid con-  during emptying), no standardized protocol to assess
            tents, which is less relevant, and can appear normal even   gastric emptying is  available.  Also,  as  this method is
            though emptying of solids is impaired. Liquids (includ-  based on the estimated change in antral volume, it might
            ing neat barium) should be emptied from the stomach   not accurately reflect gastric emptying if antral contents
            within three hours in dogs and within 60 minutes in cats   are moved into the fundus by the antral contractions.
            (50–70% of cats have an empty stomach at 15 and 30   This procedure requires a skilled operator and the
            minutes, respectively). Completion of gastric emptying   administration of a test meal or liquid of a defined vol-
            when barium is mixed with food can be variable in both   ume, which can be challenging in veterinary patients. At
            dogs and cats (4–16h), and barium can separate from the   this stage, ultrasound cannot be recommended to assess
            food, making this method unreliable to assess solid‐  gastric emptying in a routine setting.
            phase gastric emptying in small animals.
             Barium‐impregnated polyethylene spheres (BIPS)   Diagnostic Tests Currently Restricted to Referral
            were originally designed to mimic solid‐phase gastric   Centers or Research Facilities
            emptying and to detect GI obstructions. They are com-  Radioscintigraphy  is  considered  the  gold  standard
            mercially available in two sizes (1.5 and 5 mm diameter),   method to assess gastric emptying and has been used in
            with the smaller theoretically being emptied with   a number of studies to determine physiologic gastric
              digestive contractions and the larger with interdigestive   emptying times and validate new tests. Due to the need
              motility. Attempts have been made to assess gastric emp-  for special facilities and equipment, this technique is not
            tying times using BIPS in both dogs and cats, but the   often applied in small animal patients. Most commonly,
            data are not reliable. In one study using dogs, the time to   99m technetium bound to tracer substances to avoid GI
            emptying of half the administered BIPS from the stom-  absorption (i.e., albumin colloid) is used. “Dual isotope”
            ach was nearly twice as long as that of simultaneously   methods where solid‐ and liquid‐phase gastric emptying
            administered, radiolabeled food. In cats, gastric emptying   are assessed simultaneously (using both  99m technetium
   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605