Page 778 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 778

746  Section 8  Neurologic Disease

            Cellular Transplantation Therapy  Intraspinal olfactory   SCI is or is not beneficial for neurologic recovery remains
  VetBooks.ir  glial cell transplantation in dogs with  thoracolumbar   incompletely answered. Cord compression can be due to
                                                              displaced vertebral fragments, herniated intervertebral
            SCI  has  been  shown  to  have  promise  with  respect  to
            improved functional outcome. The rationale  for  this
                                                              realignment of vertebrae alone; a laminectomy or hemi-
            approach stems from the unique ability of these cells to   disk or hematomas. Decompression may be achieved by
            promote regeneration in experimentally induced injured   laminectomy may be necessary to remove material from
            spinal cord and foster a more hospitable environment for   the  vertebral  canal.  Decompressive  procedures  could
            axonal growth, increase tissue sparing after SCI, increase   produce or exacerbate instability  in the injured spine,
            tissue bridging and reduce cavity formation  following   thus requiring surgical stabilization.
            experimental SCI, and improve angiogenesis  within   Instability can be addressed surgically, by placement
            the injured spinal cord. Olfactory ensheathing glia can   of an external splint, or simply by cage rest (Table 69.2).
            be harvested from the olfactory epithelium and trans-  Surgical stabilization is the most effective method of
            planted in the same animal, thereby minimizing the like-  stabilizing an unstable spine, but is associated with sig-
            lihood of rejection. Autologous bone marrow  stromal   nificant surgical risks. A variety of different techniques
            cell transplantation has been evaluated in dogs with ver-  are used; in one of the most easily adaptable techniques,
            tebral fracture luxation and found to be feasible and safe,   screws or pins are placed in the vertebral bodies adja-
            with no complications noted.                      cent to the injury and cement is applied to hold the
              Although such  techniques  are currently in  the  early   structure in alignment (Figure 69.7). Another popular
            stages of development, they may represent the future for   technique, sometimes known as “spinal   stapling” or
            patients with acute SCI.                          “segmental stabilization,” uses pins wired to articular
                                                              facets and dorsal spinous processes to stabilize dorsally.
            Surgical Therapy                                  Different plates can be used; difficulty contouring
            A significant body of animal research has demonstrated   plates to the vertebral bodies limits options, but more
            neurologic benefit from early decompression of the   recently locking plates such as the string of pearls (SOP)
            injured spinal cord; however, such benefit is less clear in   plate have been described which can offer more
            polytrauma patients, who are often medically unstable in   flexibility.
            the acute postinjury phase. Despite the fact that early   Sacrocaudal luxations in cats are typically addressed
            spine surgery appears to be safe in polytrauma patients,   by amputation of the tail if the tail is paralyzed and has
            the question of whether early decompression for acute   no nociception. Prompt removal of the tail may limit

            Table 69.2  Advantages and disadvantages of different stabilization techniques


             Technique      Advantages                 Disadvantages             Indications
             Cage rest      ●   Inexpensive            ●   No stability provided  ●   Stable fracture (articular facet, dorsal
                            ●   No anesthetic or surgical risk  ●   No decompression  spinous and transverse processes)
                                                                                 ●   No spinal cord compression
                                                                                 ●   Mild neurologic deficits
             External splint  ●   Inexpensive          ●   Splint complications  ●   Unstable fracture
                            ●   No anesthetic or surgical risk  ●   Limited protection against   ●   Limited spinal cord compression
                                                        axial or rotational forces  ●   Mild neurologic deficits
                                                       ●   No decompression
             Screws/pins and   ●   Excellent stabilization  ●   Cost             ●   Unstable fractures
             PMMA; plates   ●   Can combine with       ●   Risk of iatrogenic injury
                              decompression             during implant placement
                                                       ●   Infection
                                                       ●   Implant failure
             Segmental      ●   Good stabilization against   ●   Suboptimal protection against   ●   Unstable lumbosacral/caudal lumbar
             stabilization    flexion and extension.    rotational and axial forces  fractures
                            ●   Reduced risk of iatrogenic   ●   Implant failure/migration
                              injury.                  ●   Infection
                            ●   Readily applied in the
                              lumbosacral region
            PMMA, polymethylmethacrylate cement.
   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783