Page 937 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 937

86  Feline Coronavirus  875

               (feces, blood, effusion, cerebrospinal fluid [CSF], tissue,   three cats with mild dry FIP, with two cats still alive after
  VetBooks.ir  and saliva) with high sensitivity. However, as with anti-  two years of the diagnosis. However, follow‐up studies
                                                                  suggested no benefit in cats with more severe forms of
               body tests, distinction of FECV from FIPV is not possi-
               ble at this time. The finding of virus in blood or tissue
                                                                  authors.
               also does not confirm FIP because FECV may be ampli-  the disease and its use is not recommended by some
               fied from these tissues in cats without FIP. A quantitative   Recent studies by Pedersen et al. have focused on anti-
               PCR test for blood, effusion, and tissue is available. The   viral  therapy. Initially, the investigators performed a
               test is based on the hypothesis that replicating virus in   study using a 3C protease inhibitor (GC376) which
               peripheral blood and tissues suggests FIPV rather than   showed some success in treating cats with FIP. Although
               FECV. However, because viremia also occurs with FECV   19 of 20 cats recovered, disease relapse occurred and 18
               infection, healthy cats may also test positive using this   months after infection only six cats remained disease
               assay.                                             free. In another study, a small molecule nucleoside
                                                                  analog, GS441524,  was  used  in  10 infected  cats  who
                                                                  were successfully treated and healthy eight months after
               Histopathology and Immunostaining
                                                                  treatment, with two cats requiring a second treatment
               Relatively distinctive inflammatory infiltrates associated   after initial relapse. This nucleoside analog works by act-
               with FIP are characterized by variable degrees of severity   ing as an alternative substrate for the viral RNA poly-
               and  contain a  combination  of macrophages, lympho-  merase terminating replication. These studies are
               cytes,  and  plasma  cells,  mixed  with  lesser  numbers  of   promising developments for future clinical trials and
               neutrophils. The hallmark of the histopathologic lesions   treatments.
               is a granulomatous to pyogranulomatous reaction with
               vascular orientation and vasculitis. Detection of intracel-
               lular FCoV antigen in macrophages in effusions by     Prognosis
               immunofluorescence, or in tissue by immunohistochem-
               istry, can confirm the diagnosis, and is considered the   With the development of FIP, prognosis is poor to grave,
               gold  standard  if  properly  performed.  Immunostaining   with a reported median survival time of 49 days.
               may be falsely negative if virus is not present in a given   Euthanasia should be considered especially when quality
               sample or if antibodies do not cross‐react with a particu-  of life is poor and there is no response to therapy within
               lar strain.                                        a short period of time. However, newer research indi-
                                                                  cates that antiviral therapy might be successful in cats
                                                                  with complete reversal of clinical signs (see earlier).
                 Therapy

               Supportive care and reducing stress are important.     Prevention
               Specific treatment has been primarily focused on reduc-
               ing the inflammatory and hyperimmune response to the
               virus. Unfortunately, increased survival has not been   The formation of antibody enhances disease, so develop-
               proven with any of these interventions. Of the immuno-  ment of an effective vaccine is difficult. At the time of
               suppressants, prednisolone at immunosuppressive doses   writing, the available vaccine is not recommended by the
               is currently the most consistently recommended.    American Association of Feline Practitioners. Reducing
               Although prednisolone may induce remission in some   stress  and  overcrowding,  cleaning  litterboxes  daily,
               cats, treatment is not curative and may only slow the   avoiding fecal–oral contact by keeping litterboxes away
               progression  of  the  disease.  Other  immunosuppressive   from food and water dishes, and separating newly
               drugs such as chlorambucil have been used in combina-  acquired cats and cats suspected of being infected are
               tion with prednisolone but the risk:benefit ratio and effi-  recommended husbandry practices.
               cacy are unknown. Feline interferon‐omega treatment is
               an immunomodulatory therapy that may be considered
               to treat FIPV‐infected cats, though studies show differ-    Public Health Implications
               ences in efficacy. Similarly, a recent study showed that
               the immunostimulant polyprenyl extended the life of   Feline coronaviruses are not thought to infect humans.
   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942