Page 941 - Clinical Small Animal Internal Medicine
P. 941

87  Feline Leukemia Virus  879

               Transmission during birth and nursing constitutes the   found to be FeLV provirus positive and FeLV   antigen
  VetBooks.ir  greatest risk of producing live, viremic kittens. There is   negative. Provirus PCR testing is positive sooner (1–2
                                                                  weeks) after FeLV exposure than antigen detection in
               some evidence that regressively infected queens may
               pass virus on to their kittens either in utero or in milk.
                                                                   Some  specialized  laboratories  offer  RT‐PCR  for  the
               Neonatal kittens are at risk of rapidly progressive infec-  blood.
               tion with clinical manifestations of hypothermia, dehy-  detection of viral RNA. The detection of viral RNA in the
               dration, failure to nurse, and early mortality, collectively   saliva correlates well with the detection of antigen in
               termed “fading kitten syndrome.” It is likely that trans-  the blood of infected cats. However, FeLV viral RNA in
               mission from infected queens to their kittens is the single   saliva and blood of experimentally infected cats was
               greatest source of FeLV infections.                found as early as one week after FeLV exposure, at least
                 Although neurologic disorders associated with FeLV   two weeks before antigen detection in the blood.
               are most often caused by compression of the brain and
               spinal cord by lymphoma tumor tissue, a mechanism for   Testing Cats for FeLV Infection
               neuropathology is also suspected to result in peripheral
               neuropathies, urinary incontinence, and ocular pathol-  ●   Test sick cats for the presence of FeLV antigenemia/
               ogy, including anisocoria, mydriasis, Horner syndrome,   viremia (using antigen tests, virus isolation, RT‐PCR
               and central blindness even in the absence of visible com-  from saliva).
               pressive lesions on diagnostic imaging. If antineoplastic     – Any cat that tests FeLV positive: retest the cat after
               therapy is planned, it is important to distinguish neopla-  1–2 months to determine whether progressive or
               sia from neuropathy.                                   regressive infection prevails. Quarantine the cat dur-
                 Stomatitis is more classically associated with feline   ing this period since the cat is a FeLV infection source
               immunodeficiency virus (FIV) infection, but FeLV infec-  for other cats. This procedure may be repeated if cir-
               tion can also predispose cats to chronic ulcerative prolif-  cumstances permit and/or the testing interval may
               erative gingivostomatitis. Clinical sequelae include pain,   be discussed with the cat owner.
               anorexia, and tooth loss. An immune‐mediated mecha-  ●   Test healthy cats for the presence of FeLV antigene-
               nism is likely, particularly in combination with co‐infec-  mia/viremia (using antigen tests, virus isolation,
               tions such as feline calicivirus.                    RT‐PCR from saliva).
                                                                       – Prior to the first FeLV vaccination, testing is recom-
                                                                      mended for every cat; prior to the second vaccina-
                 Diagnosis                                            tion (booster of basic immunization), testing is
                                                                      recommended if the cat may have been exposed to
               The outcome of a FeLV infection can be characterized   FeLV in the last 4–8 weeks.
               using the results from virus isolation, immunofluores-    – If the cat is at high risk for FeLV (outdoor access,
               cence assays, detection of FeLV p27 capsid antigen in   multicat environment, any husbandry with chang-
               serum or plasma, and detection of FeLV provirus or     ing cats, etc.).
               viral RNA in the blood or some tissues by molecular     – If  the  cat  has  moved  to  a  new  environment  (new
               assays. Serologic assays for the detection of FeLV‐spe-  home, shelter, cattery, etc.): if the cat tests negative,
               cific antibodies are currently not routinely used.     quarantine (keep from other cats and any potential
               Antigenemia (presence of p27 capsid antigen) is a      FeLV exposure) and retest after 4–6 weeks for
               marker of infection and in most, but not all cats, a   absence of FeLV antigen prior to introduction into
               parameter for viremia (presence of replication‐compe-  the new environment.
               tent virus). Detection of viremia by virus isolation is     – Any cat that tests FeLV positive: retest the cat after
               not widely available, laborious, and time consuming. In   1–2 months to determine whether progressive or
               contrast, antigenemia can be easily detected using     regressive infection prevails. Quarantine the cat dur-
               enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in a spe-    ing this period since the cat is a FeLV infection source
               cialized laboratory or by rapid point‐of‐care tests.   for other cats. This procedure may be repeated if cir-
               Most cats will test antigen positive within 3–6 weeks   cumstances permit and/or the testing interval may
               after FeLV exposure. The detection of FeLV provirus in   be discussed with the cat owner.
               the peripheral blood or certain tissues like bone mar-  ●   Test healthy cats for the presence of FeLV provirus in
               row using RT‐PCR is more sensitive than the detection   the blood (PCR). Confirmatory of positive or ques-
               of antigenemia or viremia to demonstrate previous    tionable antigen tests; true antigen‐positive samples
               FeLV exposure. Thus, a certain proportion of pet cats   are highly provirus positive.
               can be found to be PCR positive but antigen negative.     – Early infection: provirus PCR from blood tests
               In an early study in Switzerland, 10% of pet cats were     earlier positive than antigen tests.
   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946