Page 33 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 33

1.3  Classical Conditioning  5

  VetBooks.ir  on a conventional title for his thesis (Animal   due to how the responses were made by the
                                                      animal. Pavlov designed experiments involv­
             intelligence), his goal was to investigate
             animal stupidity (Walker 1983). The appara­
                                                      in one classic experiment Pavlov elicited
             tus that Thorndike used to study animal   ing unintentional behaviours. For example,
             stupidity was called a puzzle box. To picture   salivation in a dog by presenting the sound of
             a puzzle box, think of a small wooden crate   a metronome. The dog didn’t need to think
             with wooden slats, in the box was some kind   about  his  salivation;  it  was  an automatic
             of device (a sequence of strings that when   response to the sound. Few people know that
             pulled in the correct order would release a   Pavlov was an established scientist who stud­
             pin and open the box). The experiment    ied processes of digestion. He made major
             started with Thorndike placing a subject in   advances in the study of digestion by devel­
             the puzzle box. Thorndike put a hungry cat   oping surgical techniques which in 1904,
             into the box, with a piece of food visible out­  won him a Nobel Prize. Fewer people know
             side the box. He found that the cats did not   that although he is credited for discovering
             understand the sequence of strings to open   classical conditioning, this title should per­
             the door. However, if that was the end of the   haps go to a man named Edwin Twitmyer.
             story, this chapter could end here. In fact, the   Twitmyer’s  PhD  dissertation  tested  the
             cats did get out and could get out again and   knee‐jerk reflexes of college students by
             again. He credited the cats’ escape to trial‐  sounding a bell half a second before hitting
             and‐error learning, pointing out that the   the patellar tendon. After repeatedly doing
             animals weren’t using insight, inference, or   this, he found that the sound of the bell
             any other signs of ‘intelligence’ (Walker 1983).   alone  caused the knee‐jerk reflex. In 1904,
             Out of these experiments came Thorndike’s   Twitmyer  presented  his  findings  at  the
             law of effect. The law of effect states that if a   American  Psychological  Association  meet­
             stimulus is followed by a behaviour that   ing, where it drew no interest. From here,
             results in a reward, the stimulus is then more   history gets a little muddled. Some historians
             likely to give rise to the behaviour in the   state that Pavlov saw this talk, and noticed
             future. According to proponents of the law of   when he got back that his dogs salivated in
             effect, most of the behaviour we emit is due   the presence of lab coats before the food was
             to the association between the behaviour and   present, and it was this that caused him to
             its consequence. We will look at this in more   change the focus of his lab. Others state that
             detail in the operant conditioning section   Twitmyer and Pavlov were working on this
             when we talk about the psychologist B.F.   subject independently of each other. No
             Skinner.                                 matter what the real story was, we all know
                                                      that Pavlov is the one that is credited for
                                                      classical conditioning.
             1.3   Classical Conditioning              As we know, Pavlov’s process of association is
                                                      called classical conditioning (or Pavlovian con-
             Thorndike had a strong methodological and   ditioning). It should also be noted that during
             theoretical impact on animal behaviour   his research, Pavlov coined the term reinforce-
             research influencing key concepts in learning   ment to describe the strengthening of the asso­
             theory that are still relevant today. However,   ciation between an unconditioned and
             in the early 1900s, scientists had a new leader   conditioned stimulus. In classical condition­
             in the area of animal learning theory. His   ing, the animal learns to respond to a previ­
             name was Ivan Pavlov.                    ously neutral stimulus that had been paired
               Pavlov’s experiments furthered the doubt,   with another stimulus that elicits an automatic
             raised by Thorndike, that animals had much,   response. Let’s look at a real world example
             if any, cognitive ability. This uncertainty was   that I mentioned earlier and one  you may have
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38