Page 308 - The Welfare of Cattle
P. 308

heaLth, dIsease, and anIMaL WeLfare                                         285


                               DISeaSeS aFFeCteD BY CONFINeMeNt
                                COMPareD tO aCCeSS tO PaStUre

               The following meta-analysis by Arnott, G., et al. (2017). addresses two of the freedoms that
            relate to animal welfare, freedom from disease, and appropriate facilities, i.e., pasture vs. confine-
            ment, and shows that there is reduction in diseases and mortality when dairy cattle have access to
            pasture compared to animals in confinement facilities.
               Arnott et al. conducted a  review of  the literature  comparing pasture-based  dairy  cows to
            continuously housed cows. The review showed significant benefits of pasture-based cattle over
            continuously housed systems with respect to respect to health, behavior, and physiology. The
            health benefits included less lameness, fewer hock lesions, less mastitis and metritis, and lower
            mortality.  Cattle  which  had  access  to  pasture  showed  an  overall  preference  for  pasture  when
            given a choice between pasture and indoor housing. The 2010 National Animal Health Monitoring
            System (USDA, NAHMS) study reported that 63.9% of North American dairies had some type of
            housing system which accounted 82.2% of US dairy cows. However one third of US dairies use
            some combination of grazing. But in 2007, 75% of dairy cows in the US were housed in free stall
            or dry lots.

            Lameness

               The causes of lameness are multifactorial and the access to pasture is factor that can affect
            the incidence of lameness. Two controlled studies have shown a significant improvement in loco-
            motion scores and reduction in lameness when cows had access to pasture (Hernandez-Mendo et
            al., 2007; Olmos et al., 2009) and two controlled studies showed difference (Baird et al., 2009;
            Chapinal et al., 2010). For cows housed in confinement barns with free stalls, the odds of sole
            ulcers and white-line disease were twice that of those housed on deep-bedded packs (Solano
            et al., 2016). Other studies have shown that hard surfaces in confinement building contribute
            to reduce cow comfort and increased incidence of lameness (Endres, 2017). Covering concrete
            slatted floors with slatted rubber floors resulted in improved hoof health and animal hygiene
            (Ahrens, 2011).

            Mastitis

               In this multiyear meta-analysis of seasonally calving cows, Holstein cows in confinement
            had an increased prevalence of mastitis, a greater number (clinical cases of mastitis per cow) (1.1
            vs. 0.6), and greater risk of being culled due to mastitis (9.7% vs. 1.6%) compared to cows on
            pasture (Washburn, 2002). Many confinement dairies today have attained excellent udder health
            as measured by bulk tank SCCs and a low incidence of clinical mastitis through implementa-
            tion of a good mastitis control program, including a clean, dry environment, and good milking
            procedures.

            reproductive Disease

               In a comparison of cows in confinement to cows in pasture-based system, cows in confinement
            tended to have an increased incidence of dystocia, metritis, and endometritis on a small sample
            size of cows and disease (Olmos, 2009). Cows in confinement tended to fared better nutritionally in
            early lactation because dairies have greater control over the nutrient density of the ration than for
            animals on pasture.
   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313