Page 341 - The Welfare of Cattle
P. 341

318                                                       the WeLfare of CattLe


               It is worth noting that only one third of dairy producers provide their employees training on
            management of nonambulatory cattle and just a fifth provide training on euthanasia procedures
            (Adams et al., 2016b). The need for training is significant if animal well-being is a priority on dairy
            operations. Training programs that equip caretakers with the skills to maximize the comfort and
            the chances of recovery of downer animals, as well as the factors to take into account when con-
            sidering and performing euthanasia show promise in increasing the knowledge of dairy employees
            regarding welfare-related practices, including euthanasia procedures (Adams et al., 2016). Cultural
            congruency is important when considering the occupational health and safety of livestock workers
            (Menger et al., 2016b) and will impact how a multicultural population of livestock workers engages
            in discussions of animal welfare and euthanasia procedures.
               Besides written guidelines and appropriate training for caretakers, providing high-quality nurs-
            ing care requires to allocate enough labor time to the management of downer animals. Job organi-
            zation on livestock operations can be a challenge. Time pressures, lack of clarity regarding work
            responsibility, and issues with work organization have been described by employees of large dairies
            in the Western U.S. as stressors that may affect work performance (Menger et al., 2016a). If man-
            agement cannot allocate enough time for employees to tend to downer cows, the caretaker will feel
            rushed and provide suboptimal care. In addition to reducing the chances of recovery and affecting
            animal well-being, rushing through the treatment of downer animals could potentially put the care-
            taker at risk of injury.


                                    WheN eUthaNaSIa IS NeeDeD

               Euthanasia can be described as the humane termination of an animal’s life and it should be
            performed in such a way that it minimizes or eliminates distress and suffering (Underwood et al.,
            2013). Euthanasia should be considered in downers with a poor prognosis, when pain is evident
            and uncontrollable, or when adequate nursing care cannot be provided. Although some researchers
            argue that with excellent nursing care, the decision to euthanize can be delayed, under most situa-
            tions, recumbency longer than 24 hours carries a poor prognosis and euthanasia should be consid-
            ered at this time. All caretakers should focus on diagnosing, treating, and caring for the downer cow
            in such a way that she can stand up and ambulate within 24 hours. If the best treatment and nursing
            care is not successful in resolving the primary and secondary issues, then euthanasia should be seri-
            ously considered to prevent animal welfare compromise.
               In a recent survey, dairy producers reported that just about half of all downer cows were euth-
            anized, with 59% of them being euthanized within 2 days of being identified as nonambulatory
            (Adams et al., 2015a). The same producers indicated that 17.7% of downers died on the farm. With
            euthanasia being a common outcome of nonambulatory cattle cases, it is imperative that people
            performing this procedure are trained to do it effectively and safely. The American Veterinary
            Medical Association (AVMA) provides guidelines for making a decision regarding euthanasia and
            the considerations of employing various euthanasia methods in cattle (Underwood et al., 2013).
               Herd veterinarians are a resource for farm personnel training on euthanasia procedures, in addi-
            tion to the development of guidelines for making the decision to euthanize downers. A study by
            Hoe and Ruegg (2006) revealed that veterinarians were consulted about euthanasia decisions on
            dairies less than a third of the time. The same study exposed a severe need for training of personnel
            as producers reported that untrained dairy personnel performed euthanasia 13% of the time, and
            that gunshot was the most common method. These findings, in addition to the lack of nonambula-
            tory cattle management and euthanasia training reported by Adams and colleagues (2015b), are of
            concern as the efficacy of euthanasia by gunshot is dependent on the operator’s accuracy, and the
            firearm and bullets chosen by the operator. Without appropriate training, dairy personnel could be
            inflicting unnecessary suffering to the animal being euthanized and putting their own safety at risk.
   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346