Page 343 - The Welfare of Cattle

320 the WeLfare of CattLe

• Ensure that the downer has access to high-quality water and feed at all times. If free choice access
is not feasible, water and feed should be provided at least four times a day.
• Reposition the cow as to alternate the hind leg located underneath the body at least four times a day
(every 6 hours).
• If needed, move the cow to another location by using a loader bucket or by placing on a pallet.
Moving should never cause further injury and discomfort.
• Use lifting devices only when the downer cow can support her own weight after being lifted. A
well-trained caretaker should supervise the process and be available to lower her when no longer
supporting her own weight.
• Assess the condition of the downer after each treatment (at least four times per day) and inform your
supervisor if her condition is improving or deteriorating. This will help with the decision to continue
treatment or euthanize.

reFereNCeS

Adams AE, Lombard JE, Fossler, CP, Roman-Muniz, IN, Kopral, CA. 2017. Associations between housing
and management practices and the prevalence of lameness, hock lesions, and thin cows on U.S. dairy
operations. Journal of Dairy Science. 100: 2119–2136.
Adams, AE, Ahola JK, Chahine M, Roman-Muniz IN. 2016. Effect of dairy beef quality assurance training
on dairy worker knowledge and welfare-related practices. Journal of Extension. 54(5).
Adams AE, Lombard JE, Roman-Muniz IN, Fossler CP, Kopral CA. 2015a. Management of nonambulatory
dairy cows on US dairy operations. Abstract in Journal of Animal Science. 93(s3) Journal of Dairy
Science. 98, Suppl. 2.
Adams AE, Lombard JE, Roman-Muniz IN, Fossler CP, Kopral CA. 2015b. Management practices that may
affect dairy cow welfare on US dairy operations. Abstract in J. Anim. Sci. Vol. 93, Suppl. s3/J. Dairy
Sci. Vol. 98, Suppl. 2.
Correa MT, Erb HN, Scarlett JM. 1993. Risk factors for downer cow syndrome. Journal of Dairy Science.
76(11): 3460–3463.
Cox VS, McGrath CJ, Jorgensen SE. 1982. The role of pressure damage in pathogenesis of the downer cow
syndrome. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 43(1): 26–31.
Cox VS, Marsh WE, Steuernagel GR, Fletcher TF, Onapito JS. 1986. Downer cow occurrence in Minnesota
dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 4(3): 249–260.
Doonan G, Appelt M, Corbin A. 2003. Nonambulatory livestock transport: The need for consensus. The
Canadian Veterinary Journal. 44(8): 667–672.
Fenwick DC. 1969. The downer cow syndrome. Australian Veterinary Journal. 45: 184–188.
FSIS Directive 6100.1 Antimortem Livestock Inspection. 2014. United States Department of Agriculture.
www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/2b2e7adc-961e-4b1d-b593-7dc5a0263504/6100.1.pdf?MOD=AJ
PERES. Accessed January 24, 2018.
Green AL, Lombard JE, Garber LP, Wagner BA, Hill GW. 2008. Factors associated with occurrence and
recovery of nonambulatory dairy cows in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science. 91(6): 2275–2283.
Hoe FG, Ruegg PL. 2006. Opinions and practices of Wisconsin dairy producers about biosecurity and animal
well-being. Journal of Dairy Science. 89(6): 2297–2308.
Littledike ET, Young JW, Beitz DC. 1981. Common metabolic diseases of cattle: Ketosis, milk fever, grass
tetany, and downer cow complex. Journal of Dairy Science. 64(6): 1465–1482.
Menger LM, Pezzutti F, Tellechea T, Stallones L, Rosecrance J and Roman-Muniz IN. 2016. Perceptions of
health and safety among immigrant Latino/ a dairy workers in the U.S. Frontiers in Public Health.
4: 106.
Menger LM, Rosecrance J, Stallones L, Roman-Muniz IN. 2016. A guide to the design of occupational safety
and health training for immigrant, Latino/a dairy workers. Frontiers in Public Health. 4: 282.
NASS. 2005. Non-ambulatory cattle and calves. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/nacac/
nacac-05-05-2005.pdf Accessed December 13, 2017.Poulton PJ, Vizard AL, Anderson GA, Pyman
MF. 2016a. Importance of secondary damage in downer cows. Australian Veterinary Journal. 94(5):
138–144.